Automated medical technology is becoming an integral part of routine anesthetic practice. Automated technologies can improve patient safety, but may create new workflows with potentially surprising adverse consequences and cognitive errors that must be addressed before these technologies are adopted into clinical practice. Industries such as aviation and nuclear power have developed techniques to mitigate the unintended consequences of automation, including automation bias, skill loss, and system failures. In order to maximize the benefits of automated technology, clinicians should receive training in human–system interaction including topics such as vigilance, management of system failures, and maintaining manual skills. Medical device manufacturers now evaluate usability of equipment using the principles of human performance and should be encouraged to develop comprehensive training materials that describe possible system failures. Additional research in human–system interaction can improve the ways in which automated medical devices communicate with clinicians. These steps will ensure that medical practitioners can effectively use these new devices while being ready to assume manual control when necessary and prepare us for a future that includes automated health care.
Autopilots in the Operating Room: Safe Use of Automated Medical Technology
This article is featured in “This Month in Anesthesiology,” page 1A.
Submitted for publication December 13, 2019. Accepted for publication April 28, 2020. Published online first on May 26, 2020.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Keith J. Ruskin, Chase Corvin, Stephen C. Rice, Scott R. Winter; Autopilots in the Operating Room: Safe Use of Automated Medical Technology. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:653–665 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003385
Download citation file: