DESPITE increasing knowledge regarding pain treatment, an alarming proportion of patients (up to 70% depending on surgery type) develop chronic postsurgical pain. The lack of reliable models to predict and prevent such a course was recently addressed in two highly valuable reviews.1,2In summary, a large number of studies have identified several biomedical risk factors, such as type of surgery or level of postoperative pain.1However, recent research has indicated that psychosocial factors, such as preoperative anxiety and catastrophizing, may be of particular importance.1,2Unfortunately, findings on psychological variables are rather heterogeneous, and it remains to be clarified whether such factors are causally related to the development of chronic pain or mainly associative.2There is a need to explore more systematically the roles of clearly defined and theoretically relevant psychological variables to build a coherent model that is better able to predict and prevent chronic postsurgical pain and disability successfully.

In general, the development of such a model should be based on a well-organized theoretical framework. Learning theory (i.e. , classic and operant conditioning) is an empirically well-supported model to predict and influence human behavior, and it has been instrumental in the evolution of cognitive behavioral treatments. The role of cognitive behavioral treatments in chronic pain treatment is well established today, and a large body of research supports the idea that behavioral strategies used to deal with pain (e.g. , avoid or approach) are more relevant to subsequent suffering and disability than the level of pain intensity.3–5Accordingly, a shift in focus from pain-related experience to behavior can be useful to identify and directly target processes that may be central to the development of chronic pain and disability.

Recent developments within cognitive behavioral treatments, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT),6have emphasized acceptance of, or willingness to experience, chronic pain and distress rather than trying to control or reduce such symptoms.7,8In ACT, people's unwillingness to remain in contact with negative private events (e.g. , pain, fatigue, and anxiety) is seen as an important determinant of emotional turmoil and dysfunctional behavior.6In avoiding unpleasant private experiences, that is, experiential avoidance, people commonly engage in behaviors that may not only produce short-term symptom relief but also prevent activities in line with personally relevant life values (e.g. , visiting friends). Importantly, frequent use of avoidance strategies tends to produce, over time, a narrow and inflexible pattern of action dominated by the intent to minimize symptoms (e.g. , pain). As illustrated in figure 1, this pattern often results in increased disability without any corresponding decrease in symptoms. The perceived need to avoid negative private experiences is considered to result from cognitive fusion, a process in which thoughts about an event become merged with the actual event, thus evoking the same emotional reactions and behaviors as the event itself. Expressed differently, cognitive fusion is manifest when psychological experiences have an excessive or improper effect on the behavior, thereby bringing the individual farther away from valued living (fig. 1). The individual's inability to act effectively in accordance with personally relevant life values in the presence of unpleasant thoughts, emotions, or bodily symptoms is referred to as psychological inflexibility.6Behaviors characterized by psychological inflexibility (e.g. , unwillingness, avoidance, and cognitive fusion) have been shown to contribute to a range of psychological and medical problems, such as work absence, depression, and increased medication use.4,5In fact, the tendency to avoid negative experiences paradoxically seems to make people more vulnerable to a variety of stressors, such as pain and anxiety. In contrast, the ability to be present with unpleasant private experiences while still taking effective actions (psychological flexibility) seems highly relevant to optimize functioning and quality of life.

Fig. 1.  Avoidance of situations associated with increased pain or distress is reinforced (negatively and positively), creating a vicious circle that, over time, tends to reduce the number of valued activities in a downward spiral, without having any substantial or sustained effect on symptoms.

Fig. 1.  Avoidance of situations associated with increased pain or distress is reinforced (negatively and positively), creating a vicious circle that, over time, tends to reduce the number of valued activities in a downward spiral, without having any substantial or sustained effect on symptoms.

Within the area of pain, empirical support for processes related to psychological flexibility has grown rapidly during the past decade. For example, various laboratory studies have shown that acceptance may increase pain tolerance more effectively than strategies aimed at controlling pain.9In samples with chronic pain patients, psychological flexibility has been associated with, for example, lower levels of depression, disability, and pain.4,5Clinical treatment evaluations (randomized controlled trials and large open trials) have illustrated that interventions based on ACT can improve functioning and quality of life for patients with chronic debilitating pain.7,8Also, recent analyses suggest that psychological flexibility may mediate the effects of pain and distress on disability.10–12Thus, although pain or distress may lead to disability, this relationship seems to be significantly influenced by the ability to act in accordance with personally defined life values (or long-term goals) even in the presence of that pain and distress (i.e. , psychological flexibility).

No study has investigated the role of psychological flexibility in the transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain. We suggest that there are several reasons why psychological inflexibility may be a central mediating process in this transition. First, psychological inflexibility has repeatedly been shown to be an important link between pain (including related thoughts and emotions) and, for example, disability.4,5,11Second, longitudinal studies have indicated that it may predict future functioning and pain adjustment.13Third, results from ACT-based interventions have shown that psychological flexibility is sensitive to change, and that improvements in psychological flexibility have been associated with increased functioning and life quality.7,12 

The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale was recently developed to assess avoidance and cognitive fusion, that is, key aspects of psychological inflexibility,5,11in patients with existing pain. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale is a reliable and valid instrument and may thus be used in, for example, the subacute postoperative stage to explore the importance of psychological inflexibility in the development of chronic postsurgical pain. Furthermore, instruments such as the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale could possibly be used to identify patients at risk for developing chronic pain and disability. For this group of patients, interventions based on ACT (e.g. , promoting acceptance of pain and supporting value-oriented behavior) may be useful to improve the ability to adjust to remaining postsurgical pain and distress. More specifically, pain management based on ACT has the potential to increase pain tolerance, facilitate effective action, and contribute to the prevention of dysfunctional behavior that may otherwise result in depression, social withdrawal, pain-related disability, and lower quality of life.

In conclusion, psychological inflexibility seems to play an important role in chronic pain. On the basis of these findings, we propose that this may be a particularly relevant factor in the transition from acute to chronic pain and therefore suggest this as a focus for future studies aimed at developing a coherent model to predict and prevent chronic postsurgical pain and disability.

*Behavioral Medicine Pain Treatment Service, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. †Behavioral Medicine Pain Treatment Service, Karolinska University Hospital, and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet.

Katz J, Seltzer Z: Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: Risk factors and protective factors. Expert Rev Neurother 2009; 9:723–44
Hinrichs-Rocker A, Schulz K, Jarvinen I, Lefering R, Simanski C, Neugebauer EA: Psychosocial predictors and correlates for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP): A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2009; 13:719–30
Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ: Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain 2000; 85:317–32
McCracken LM: Learning to live with the pain: Acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain 1998; 74:21–7
Wicksell RK, Renofalt J, Olsson GL, Bond FW, Melin L: Avoidance and cognitive fusion: Central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS). Eur J Pain 2008; 12:491–500
Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. New York, Guilford Press, 1999
New York
Guilford Press
Vowles KE, McCracken LM: Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: A study of treatment effectiveness and process. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008; 76:397–407
Wicksell RK, Melin L, Lekander M, Olsson GL: Evaluating the effectiveness of exposure and acceptance strategies to improve functioning and quality of life in longstanding pediatric pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pain 2009; 141:248–57
Hayes SC, Bissett RT, Korn Z, Zettle RD, Rosenfarb I, Cooper L, Grundt A: The impact of acceptance versus  control rationales on pain tolerance. Psychol Rec 1999; 49:33–47
Vowles KE, McCracken LM, Eccleston C: Patient functioning and catastrophizing in chronic pain: The mediating effects of acceptance. Health Psychol 2008; 27:S136–43
Wicksell RK, Lekander M, Sorjonen K, Olsson GL: The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability. Eur J Pain 2010 Aug; 14(7):771.e1–14. Epub 2010 Jan 27
Wicksell RK, Olsson GL, Hayes SC: Psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvement in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for patients with chronic pain following whiplash. Eur J Pain 2010 Jun 8. [Epub ahead of print]
McCracken LM, Eccleston C: A prospective study of acceptance of pain and patient functioning with chronic pain. Pain 2005; 118:164–9