Abstract

Background:

Although it is recognized that pulmonary hysteresis can influence the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), the extent to which expansion of previously opened (vs. newly opening) peripheral airspaces contribute to increased lung volume is unknown.

Methods:

Following a recruitment maneuver, rats were ventilated with constant tidal volumes and imaged during ascending and descending ramps of PEEP.

Results:

The authors estimated peripheral airspace dimensions by measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient of 3He in 10 rats. In a separate group (n = 5) undergoing a similar protocol, the authors used computerized tomography to quantify lung volume. Hysteresis was confirmed by larger end-inspiratory lung volume (mean ± SD; all PEEP levels included): 8.4 ± 2.8 versus 6.8 ± 2.0 ml (P < 0.001) and dynamic compliance: 0.52 ± 0.12 versus 0.42 ± 0.09 ml/cm H2O (P < 0.001) during descending versus ascending PEEP ramps. Apparent diffusion coefficient increased with PEEP, but it was smaller during the descending versus ascending ramps for corresponding levels of PEEP: 0.168 ± 0.019 versus 0.183 ± 0.019 cm2/s (P < 0.001). Apparent diffusion coefficient was smaller in the posterior versus anterior lung regions, but the effect of PEEP and hysteresis on apparent diffusion coefficient was greater in the posterior regions.

Conclusions:

The authors’ study results suggest that in healthy lungs, larger lung volumes due to hysteresis are associated with smaller individual airspaces. This may be explained by opening of previously nonaerated peripheral airspaces rather than expansion of those already aerated. Setting PEEP on a descending ramp may minimize distension of individual airspaces.

What We Already Know about This Topic
  • Hysteresis of the lung occurs because of the increased energy required for opening the lung during inspiration

What This Article Tells Us That Is New
  • In healthy rats, larger lung volumes due to hysteresis were associated with smaller individual airspace dimensions, suggesting opening of previously nonaerated peripheral airspaces rather than expansion of already opened airspaces

MECHANICAL ventilation causes lung injury associated with tissue stress and deformation but may be lessened by use of lower tidal volume (VT) and optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).1  Although the impact of VT is established,2  optimizing PEEP is less well understood.3  Hysteresis—an energy dissipating mechanism—is characterized by greater lung volume at a given distending pressure (e.g., PEEP) during deflation versus during inflation and may be apparent when the level of PEEP is increased or decreased.4  Although hysteresis is considered in terms of overall elasticity, the relationship among altered PEEP, hysteresis, and airway dimensions is not understood.5  Early morphometric studies in healthy lungs6,7  indicated that hysteresis may result from volume-dependent alterations in surfactant8  or tissue viscoelasticity properties,9  but other studies reported that individual airspace dimensions were unchanged10  or decreased11  despite larger overall lung volume (i.e., alveolar recruitment12 —the sustained opening of previously collapsed or under-ventilated airspaces). Although recruitment characterizes the response to PEEP in lungs with atelectasis and lung injury,4  evidence suggests that it contributes to lung expansion in healthy lungs also.13 

Hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging (HPMRI) provides both in vivo and noninvasive estimates of the dimensional properties of small airspaces14  and is accomplished by measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of hyperpolarized 3He gas within the ventilated parenchyma.15  ADC estimates the dimensions of peripheral airspaces by measuring the space available for diffusion. Using this approach, we previously reported that in the injured16  and atelectatic lung,17  the mean dimensions of ventilated airspaces were decreased after recruitment. However, the relationships among altered PEEP, hysteresis, and airspace dimensions are unknown in normal lungs during anesthesia. We hypothesized that hysteresis is associated with smaller ADC despite larger lung volume during descending versus ascending PEEP, due to increased numbers of newly aerated airspaces rather than further expansion of already aerated units.

Materials and Methods

Studies were performed on male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 15; weighing 400 ± 50 g), after approval by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). The experimental protocol is described in full detail in Methods, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A988. In brief, general anesthesia and paralysis were induced and maintained with intraperitoneal pentobarbital and intravenous pancuronium bromide. The trachea intubated and airway pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation levels were measured.16,17  Normothermia was maintained.

Experimental Outline

All rats were ventilated in the supine position with a magnetic resonance imaging–compatible small animal ventilator,18  with the following initial ventilator settings (VT, 10 ml/kg; PEEP, 0 cm H2O; Fio2, 0.21; rate 53 min−1), which were shown to guarantee normal gas exchange in pilot experiments. To standardize lung volume history, an alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed before the first image acquisition. Ten animals underwent HPMRI to measure the ADC of 3He during ascending and descending PEEP trials; this was designed to illustrate hysteresis in a lung inflation–deflation cycle. After baseline measurements, PEEP was increased from 0 to 9 cm H2O (in 3 cm H2O increments) and returned to baseline in the reverse process (fig. 1). To quantify lung volume hysteresis and recruitment, computerized tomography (CT) was performed in place of HPMRI on a separate group of five animals undergoing similar ventilator protocols. In HPMRI rats, each PEEP level was maintained for a 90-s period before ADC measurement (to minimize 3He gas depolarization). For the animals that underwent CT, each PEEP level was maintained for an additional 8 min to permit adequate image acquisition. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and dynamic compliance [Cdyn=VT/(PIP − PEEP)] were measured at the end of each PEEP period in all animals. The ADC measurements obtained at PEEP 0 cm H2O in five animals of the HPMRI group have been used as ventilated, noninjured group in a previously published experiment.16  After the last set of measurements, animals were euthanized by lethal pentobarbital injection.

Fig. 1.

Representative trend of airway pressures during positive end-expiratory pressure ramps and imaging series. Positive end-expiratory pressure was increased and decreased between 0 and 9 cm H2O in 3 cm H2O steps. Each positive end-expiratory pressure level was maintained for 90 s before image acquisitions.

Fig. 1.

Representative trend of airway pressures during positive end-expiratory pressure ramps and imaging series. Positive end-expiratory pressure was increased and decreased between 0 and 9 cm H2O in 3 cm H2O steps. Each positive end-expiratory pressure level was maintained for 90 s before image acquisitions.

HPMRI

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a diffusion-weighted gradient echo pulse sequence, and the ADC acquisition is detailed in Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A988, as previously described.17  In brief, animals were placed supine in the magnetic resonance imaging scanner and in a radiofrequency coil that was tuned to the 3He resonance frequency. End-inspiratory images were obtained in a 20-mm thick subcardiac axial slice, following ventilation with a mixture of hyperpolarized 3He and oxygen.15,17 3He gas had been previously hyperpolarized to approximately 30% over 14 h.19  Each ADC acquisition was obtained during a single breath-hold and consisted of multiple diffusion-weighted images, each corresponding to a different diffusion-sensitizing gradient. Images were analyzed by fitting the time evolution of each pixel signal intensity to a standard equation, to yield maps of regional ADC values. Maps were subdivided in three horizontal bins of equal thickness in the upper to lower direction, to study the vertical distribution of ADC signal. Single-breath 3He spin density images were also acquired.

CT Imaging

High-resolution, end-inspiration CT scans were acquired using a micro-CT scanner, and they were reconstructed to three-dimensional whole lung maps with 100-µm isotropic resolution. Quantitative analysis of CT density used established methods to quantify end-inspiratory lung gas volume (EILV),20  atelectasis, and recruitment21  at different levels of PEEP.

Statistical Analysis

Mean, SD, and skewness of ADC were calculated for each imaged HPMRI slice as previously described.17  Group mean and SD of all the computed quantities were calculated. Repeated measurements two-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the main effects of changes in PEEP (between 0 and 6 cm H2O) in ascending versus descending ramps on tested variables. Post hoc comparisons (paired t tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) were conducted to test differences between individual ascending or descending PEEP values. The area under the curve method for serial measurement analysis22  was used to test (by paired t test) for differences between ascending and descending ramps. P value less than 0.05 (for two-tailed hypothesis) was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using “R” (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria§§) applications developed in the authors’ laboratory.

Results

Ascending PEEP ramps were associated with increasing PIP (fig. 2A) and decreasing Cdyn (fig. 2B). PIP was significantly lower—and Cdyn higher—during descending versus ascending PEEP (P < 0.001). PIP and Cdyn values in response to PEEP were comparable in the CT and HPMRI experiments.

Fig. 2.

Group averages and SD for (A) peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and (B) dynamic compliance (Cdyn) versus PEEP. Values obtained during ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending vs. descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t test for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001. The area under the curve subtended by PIP was larger in the ascending than in the descending PEEP ramp (P < 0.001); the area under the curve subtended by Cdyn was larger with descending PEEP (P < 0.001).

Fig. 2.

Group averages and SD for (A) peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and (B) dynamic compliance (Cdyn) versus PEEP. Values obtained during ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending vs. descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t test for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001. The area under the curve subtended by PIP was larger in the ascending than in the descending PEEP ramp (P < 0.001); the area under the curve subtended by Cdyn was larger with descending PEEP (P < 0.001).

Apparent diffusion coefficient maps and frequency distributions were obtained from a representative animal during PEEP trials (fig. 3). ADC increased with ascending PEEP and decreased with descending PEEP; however, the ADC values during descending PEEP were lower than on the ascending PEEP ramp. The variation of the mean ± SD for the ADC values is plotted (fig. 4A), as a function of both ascending and descending PEEP ramps (and in fig. 4B as a function of PIP). Repeated measures two-way ANOVA confirmed that the effects of both the type of PEEP ramp (descending vs. ascending) and of changing PEEP level on ADC were significant (P < 0.001). A PEEP increase from 0 to 6 cm H2O resulted in an increase of 15.8% in mean ADC (fig. 4A; P < 0.001). However, further increase in PEEP from 6 to 9 cm H2O resulted in a small decrease in mean ADC (3.6%; P < 0.01), as well as signal attenuation (fig. 3). ADC decreased monotonically as PEEP was lowered (fig. 4A).

Fig. 3.

Representative (A) axial magnetic resonance images, (B) axial apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and (C) apparent diffusion coefficient frequency distribution histograms obtained from a ventilated rat during ascending and descending positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ramps between 0 and 9 cm H2O in 3 cm H2O steps.

Fig. 3.

Representative (A) axial magnetic resonance images, (B) axial apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and (C) apparent diffusion coefficient frequency distribution histograms obtained from a ventilated rat during ascending and descending positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ramps between 0 and 9 cm H2O in 3 cm H2O steps.

Fig. 4.

Group averages and SD for: (A) 3He apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); (B) ADC versus peak inspiratory pressure (PIP); (C) ADC SD versus PEEP; and (D) skewness of ADC frequency distribution versus PEEP. Values obtained during both ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending versus descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t tests for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001, †P < 0.01; PEEP 6 versus 9 cm H2O: #P < 0.01. The area under the curve subtended by ADC was larger in the ascending than in the descending PEEP ramps (P < 0.001). Area under the curve comparisons between ascending and descending PEEP ramps were significant also for ADC SD (P < 0.05) and for ADC skewness (P < 0.01).

Fig. 4.

Group averages and SD for: (A) 3He apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); (B) ADC versus peak inspiratory pressure (PIP); (C) ADC SD versus PEEP; and (D) skewness of ADC frequency distribution versus PEEP. Values obtained during both ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending versus descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t tests for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001, †P < 0.01; PEEP 6 versus 9 cm H2O: #P < 0.01. The area under the curve subtended by ADC was larger in the ascending than in the descending PEEP ramps (P < 0.001). Area under the curve comparisons between ascending and descending PEEP ramps were significant also for ADC SD (P < 0.05) and for ADC skewness (P < 0.01).

The area under the ADC–PEEP curve had higher values during ascending versus descending PEEP ramps (fig. 4A), as with the ADC–PIP relationship (fig. 4B), although the degree of hysteresis was smaller (i.e., lower PIP values) during decreasing PEEP (fig. 2A). The group statistics for SD (fig. 4C) and skewness (fig. 4D) of the ADC frequency distribution are shown for each HPMRI image. The lower SD and increased skewness observed in the descending (vs. ascending) PEEP ramps indicated a more homogeneous distribution of ADC (i.e., a larger contribution from smaller airspaces), in the descending PEEP ramp.

We detected vertical changes in ADC (fig. 5): the mean ADC increased from the lower to the upper bin levels at PEEP 0 cm H2O (but not at PEEP 9 cm H2O; fig. 5A). The effects of PEEP were more in the lower bin (i.e., larger difference of ADC at PEEP 9 vs. 0 cm H2O; fig. 5B), as was the case with hysteresis (i.e., lower ADC in descending vs. ascending ramp at PEEP 0 cm H2O).

Fig. 5.

(A) Vertical distribution of average values and SD of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in three horizontal bins of equal size at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cm H2O (ascending and descending ramp) and PEEP 9 cm H2O. (B) Percent change of ADC going from PEEP 0 cm H2O to PEEP 9 cm H2O (ascending ramp) and between ascending and descending ramps at PEEP 0 cm H2O. Effect of bin level (ANOVA): ‡P < 0.01 and †P < 0.05.

Fig. 5.

(A) Vertical distribution of average values and SD of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in three horizontal bins of equal size at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cm H2O (ascending and descending ramp) and PEEP 9 cm H2O. (B) Percent change of ADC going from PEEP 0 cm H2O to PEEP 9 cm H2O (ascending ramp) and between ascending and descending ramps at PEEP 0 cm H2O. Effect of bin level (ANOVA): ‡P < 0.01 and †P < 0.05.

Whole lung CT image reconstructions indicated a smaller total lung volume in ascending versus descending PEEP (fig. 6A). The unprocessed axial CT images are shown in figure 6B, (color postthresholding maps of the same slices are in fig. 6C). Hysteresis was evident by greater EILV (fig. 7A) and lower PIP levels (fig. 7B) during descending versus ascending PEEP ramps.

Fig. 6.

(A) Tridimensional reconstructions of the whole lung, obtained by automatic segmentation and thresholding of computerized tomography images (excluding Hounsfield units [HU] greater than −200), are shown for all levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in a representative rat. Images obtained during ascending and descending PEEP are superimposed on each other and color-coded: white for increasing PEEP and red for decreasing PEEP. Lung dimensions during descending PEEP were larger than those measured in the ascending ramp, except for the areas colored in white, where they overlapped. (B) Axial computerized tomography slices obtained in the same animal at all PEEP levels are shown. Images were obtained shortly after a recruitment maneuver, and no significant atelectasis is visible. (C) Postthresholding maps of the same computerized tomography slices show exclusion of major blood vessels and nonpulmonary tissue only.

Fig. 6.

(A) Tridimensional reconstructions of the whole lung, obtained by automatic segmentation and thresholding of computerized tomography images (excluding Hounsfield units [HU] greater than −200), are shown for all levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in a representative rat. Images obtained during ascending and descending PEEP are superimposed on each other and color-coded: white for increasing PEEP and red for decreasing PEEP. Lung dimensions during descending PEEP were larger than those measured in the ascending ramp, except for the areas colored in white, where they overlapped. (B) Axial computerized tomography slices obtained in the same animal at all PEEP levels are shown. Images were obtained shortly after a recruitment maneuver, and no significant atelectasis is visible. (C) Postthresholding maps of the same computerized tomography slices show exclusion of major blood vessels and nonpulmonary tissue only.

Fig. 7.

Group averages and SD for (A) end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); (B) EILV versus peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Values obtained during both ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending vs. descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t test for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001. The area under the curve subtended by EILV was larger in the descending than in the ascending PEEP ramp (P < 0.01).

Fig. 7.

Group averages and SD for (A) end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); (B) EILV versus peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Values obtained during both ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending vs. descending): ¶P < 0.001. Paired t test for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001. The area under the curve subtended by EILV was larger in the descending than in the ascending PEEP ramp (P < 0.01).

Quantitative analysis of CT density (table 1, see Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A989) demonstrated a small amount (<0.5% of total lung weight) of nonaerated lung tissue, suggesting that recruitment before imaging minimized atelectasis. However, a quota of poorly aerated tissue was observed at PEEP 0 cm H2O (less at PEEP 9 cm H2O) and is consistent with recruitment of poorly aerated airspaces. Hyperinflated tissue was quantitatively small and detected only at PEEP 9 cm H2O. CT also demonstrated a vertical distribution of densities (increasing upper to lower), with a larger response to PEEP in the lower regions (fig. 1, see Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A990).

Discussion

In this study of diffusion HPMRI in healthy anesthetized animals, larger lung volumes corresponding to pulmonary hysteresis were associated with smaller aerated airspaces, especially in dependent lung. We16,17  and others23  previously observed decreased airspace dimensions after recruitment in atelectatic17  and injured16,23  lungs. The current data advance previous findings and suggest that hysteresis in the healthy lung reflects opening of previously nonaerated airspaces rather than further expansion of those already aerated. We used ADC because it permits noninvasive, serial quantification of airspace geometry in vivo, has advantages over standard morphometric approaches (i.e., tissue handling, restricted visualization),24,25  and is in good agreement with established morphometric measures.15,26 

The current study protocol resulted in hysteresis by the sequential increase and decrease in airway pressure (fig. 1); under these conditions, hysteresis appeared to be associated with de novo aeration rather than further expansion of already aerated airspaces. In fact, the lower ADC during descending PEEP ramps indicates smaller airspaces in the descending versus the ascending ramp (fig. 4, A and B).

The study puts local airspace volume (from ADC) and overall lung volume (EILV, from CT scan) into perspective: the airspace hysteresis is in the opposite direction to that of the EILV (fig. 7, A and B). Indeed, plot of the fractional changes from baseline of ADC versus EILV (fig. 8) demonstrates smaller individual airspaces and larger global lung volumes, in the descending versus ascending PEEP ramp. Although these data contrast with morphometric studies reporting alveolar dilatation associated with lung inflation and hysteresis,6,7  they are supported by aerosol deposition studies indicating greater numbers of smaller alveoli in descending versus ascending limbs of an inflation–deflation cycle.11  In addition, the current data indicate decreased dispersion and increased skewness (i.e., favoring smaller values) of the frequency distribution of ADC (fig. 4, C and D); such data are more consistent with opening of smaller (not further expansion of already ventilated) airspaces.17,27 

Fig. 8.

Relative values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC*) and end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV*) expressed as a fraction of their baseline values at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cm H2O (ascending ramp) and plotted versus each other at each level of ascending and descending PEEP. EILV and ADC were obtained in different groups of animals at matching experimental conditions. Error bars indicate SD for ADC (vertical bars) and for EILV (horizontal bars).

Fig. 8.

Relative values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC*) and end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV*) expressed as a fraction of their baseline values at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cm H2O (ascending ramp) and plotted versus each other at each level of ascending and descending PEEP. EILV and ADC were obtained in different groups of animals at matching experimental conditions. Error bars indicate SD for ADC (vertical bars) and for EILV (horizontal bars).

We observed a vertical distribution of ADC (fig. 5A), which likely reflects the known vertical gradients of lung aeration associated with gravity and compressive factors.28  Thus, airspace expansion by PEEP (fig. 5B) was more evident in the lower regions. Poor dependent aeration may also explain why the effect of hysteresis on ADC and airspace reopening was more prominent in lower lung.

The current study differs from our previous study of ADC16,17  in that the lungs were uninjured, recruitment maneuvers were performed, and supplemental oxygen was avoided. Although frank atelectasis was present in previous studies,16,17  the degree of atelectasis in the current study was minimal based on qualitative (fig. 6B) and quantitative CT (table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A989). Thus the precise nature of the subsequently recruited airspaces is unclear, but the data suggest hypoventilated units and microatelectasis.29  Although alveolar dimensions in healthy rats range between 40 and 100 µm,7  deaerated alveoli occupy considerable less space,30  and when sparsely distributed, they are below the 100 µm resolution of our CT (fig. 1, see also Supplemental Digital Content 4, http://links.lww.com/ALN/A991). Furthermore, recruitment may be integral to normal inflation, as suggested by 3He lung morphometry (discriminates alveolar vs. alveolar duct dimensions at varying lung volume)31  and intravital microscopy.13 

We observed a biphasic response of ADC to increasing PEEP (fig. 4A). These findings are similar to those reported using ex vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy during inflation of healthy mouse lungs,32  where mean alveolar size increased up to a threshold airway pressure (25 cm H2O) and thereafter decreased. Although this could represent redistribution of gas from previously inflated to newly open units,11,23,27  it could be due to opening of smaller alveoli.32  Recruitment is consistent with reduced compliance associated with increasing PEEP (fig. 2B), which may reflect regional lung tissue compression33  or progressive tissue stiffening due to increased airway pressure (demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging).34  Tissue stretch may not be countered by an increased number of open airspaces, and thereby result in lower overall lung compliance.

The current data may have implications for development of ventilator-associated lung injury, which is a major concern in patients with injured lungs2  and is a potential risk in ventilated surgical patients without overtly injured lungs.35  Although multiple studies indicate that PEEP can attenuate experimental lung injury,36,37  the clinical impact has been far less3 ; thus, further insights into potential mechanisms of protection by PEEP are key. The current findings that recruitment and PEEP decrease airspace distension, coupled with recent indications that lung recruitment in anesthetized patients may improve postoperative lung function,38  may together suggest that techniques enabling titration of recruitment (or PEEP) against airspace micromechanics may ultimately help to translate the experimental benefits of PEEP into clinical practice. In the interim, setting PEEP on a descending ramp after recruitment—shown to optimize gas exchange and lung aeration in healthy lungs39 —may be a reasonable choice for lung protection during surgical anesthesia.

There are limitations to extrapolation of the current work. First, there are important limitations to extrapolation in terms of lung size and thoracic compliance. Mechanical ventilation, particularly at 0 cm H2O PEEP, does not correspond to the state of inflation of healthy, spontaneously breathing subjects. However, the experimental setup was comparable with those in similar experimental models that have provided important insights,36,37,40,41  and such ventilator settings are required to ensure adequate gas exchange. Although not recommended, survey data indicate that comparable ventilator settings (i.e., high VT, 0 cm H2O PEEP) continue to be used in anesthetized patients.42  Second, the relationship among ADC, hysteresis, and altered PEEP may be altered by the onset of more significant atelectasis, in case of prolonged monotonous ventilation with low PEEP;40  however, atelectasis would likely augment ADC hysteresis—the use of a recruitment maneuver aimed to mitigate any such augmentation of ADC.17  Furthermore, the findings reflect similar investigations in injured and atelectatic lungs,16,17  as well as alternative models assessed by traditional morphometry.10,43 

Technical issues are important in this work. For example, ADC cannot distinguish between alveoli and alveolar ducts.31  The different image acquisition times may have affected the comparison between ADC versus EILV, as PEEP was maintained for shorter interval during HPMRI than during CT—necessary to limit signal loss from 3He repolarization. Nonetheless, any impact of these different time-frames would likely be minimal in the current model because of the absence of injury and stable airspaces, as well as previous experience in healthy rats17  indicating stability of ADC during such a timescale. In addition, the similar values of PIP and Cdyn in the two groups further confirm comparable conditions.

Finally, the anesthesia used was intraperitoneal pentobarbital, and it is unknown whether a different anesthetic (i.e., inhaled) would have different effects. We believe that this is unlikely as there are minimal effects of anesthetic type on intrinsic lung mechanics (except, perhaps in bronchospasm), whereas propensity to progressive atelectasis seems to be more determined by the impact on respiratory muscle tone activity than by choice of anesthetic.44 

Our results suggest that in healthy lungs, larger lung volumes due to hysteresis are associated with smaller individual airspace dimensions. This may be explained by opening of previously nonaerated peripheral airspaces rather than expansion of those already aerated. Setting PEEP on a descending ramp minimizes distension of individual airspaces and may potentially attenuate propensity to lung injury.

The authors thank the support of Small Animal Imaging Facility at the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

§§

Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed July 31, 2013.

References

1.
Dreyfuss
D
,
Saumon
G
:
Ventilator-induced lung injury: Lessons from experimental studies.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1998
;
157
:
294
323
2.
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network.
N Engl J Med
2000
;
342
:
1301
8
3.
Briel
M
,
Meade
M
,
Mercat
A
,
Brower
RG
,
Talmor
D
,
Walter
SD
,
Slutsky
AS
,
Pullenayegum
E
,
Zhou
Q
,
Cook
D
,
Brochard
L
,
Richard
JC
,
Lamontagne
F
,
Bhatnagar
N
,
Stewart
TE
,
Guyatt
G
:
Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA
2010
;
303
:
865
73
4.
Hickling
KG
:
Best compliance during a decremental, but not incremental, positive end-expiratory pressure trial is related to open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure: A mathematical model of acute respiratory distress syndrome lungs.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2001
;
163
:
69
78
5.
Escolar
JD
,
Escolar
A
:
Lung hysteresis: A morphological view.
Histol Histopathol
2004
;
19
:
159
66
6.
Storey
WF
,
Staub
NC
:
Ventilation of terminal air units.
J Appl Physiol
1962
;
17
:
391
7
7.
Mercer
RR
,
Laco
JM
,
Crapo
JD
:
Three-dimensional reconstruction of alveoli in the rat lung for pressure-volume relationships.
J Appl Physiol
1987
;
62
:
1480
7
8.
Bachofen
H
,
Hildebrandt
J
,
Bachofen
M
:
Pressure-volume curves of air- and liquid-filled excised lungs-surface tension in situ.
J Appl Physiol
1970
;
29
:
422
31
9.
Brewer
KK
,
Sakai
H
,
Alencar
AM
,
Majumdar
A
,
Arold
SP
,
Lutchen
KR
,
Ingenito
EP
,
Suki
B
:
Lung and alveolar wall elastic and hysteretic behavior in rats: Effects of in vivo elastase treatment.
J Appl Physiol
2003
;
95
:
1926
36
10.
Escolar
JD
,
Escolar
MA
,
Guzmán
J
,
Roqués
M
:
Pressure volume curve and alveolar recruitment/de-recruitment. A morphometric model of the respiratory cycle.
Histol Histopathol
2002
;
17
:
383
92
11.
Smaldone
GC
,
Mitzner
W
,
Itoh
H
:
Role of alveolar recruitment in lung inflation: Influence on pressure-volume hysteresis.
J Appl Physiol
1983
;
55
:
1321
32
12.
Cheng
W
,
DeLong
DS
,
Franz
GN
,
Petsonk
EL
,
Frazer
DG
:
Contribution of opening and closing of lung units to lung hysteresis.
Respir Physiol
1995
;
102
:
205
15
13.
Carney
DE
,
Bredenberg
CE
,
Schiller
HJ
,
Picone
AL
,
McCann
UG
,
Gatto
LA
,
Bailey
G
,
Fillinger
M
,
Nieman
GF
:
The mechanism of lung volume change during mechanical ventilation.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999
;
160
:
1697
702
14.
Tanoli
TS
,
Woods
JC
,
Conradi
MS
,
Bae
KT
,
Gierada
DS
,
Hogg
JC
,
Cooper
JD
,
Yablonskiy
DA
:
In vivo lung morphometry with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI in canines with induced emphysema: Disease progression and comparison with computed tomography.
J Appl Physiol
2007
;
102
:
477
84
15.
Ishii
M
,
Emami
K
,
Xin
Y
,
Barulic
A
,
Kotzer
CJ
,
Logan
GA
,
Chia
E
,
MacDuffie-Woodburn
JP
,
Zhu
J
,
Pickup
S
,
Kuzma
N
,
Kadlecek
S
,
Podolin
PL
,
Rizi
RR
:
Regional function-structure relationships in lungs of an elastase murine model of emphysema.
J Appl Physiol
2012
;
112
:
135
48
16.
Cereda
M
,
Emami
K
,
Xin
Y
,
Kadlecek
S
,
Kuzma
NN
,
Mongkolwisetwara
P
,
Profka
H
,
Pickup
S
,
Ishii
M
,
Kavanagh
BP
,
Deutschman
CS
,
Rizi
RR
:
Imaging the interaction of atelectasis and overdistension in surfactant-depleted lungs.
Crit Care Med
2013
;
41
:
527
35
17.
Cereda
M
,
Emami
K
,
Kadlecek
S
,
Xin
Y
,
Mongkolwisetwara
P
,
Profka
H
,
Barulic
A
,
Pickup
S
,
Månsson
S
,
Wollmer
P
,
Ishii
M
,
Deutschman
CS
,
Rizi
RR
:
Quantitative imaging of alveolar recruitment with hyperpolarized gas MRI during mechanical ventilation.
J Appl Physiol
2011
;
110
:
499
511
18.
Spector
ZZ
,
Emami
K
,
Fischer
MC
,
Zhu
J
,
Ishii
M
,
Yu
J
,
Kadlecek
S
,
Driehuys
B
,
Panettieri
RA
,
Lipson
DA
,
Gefter
W
,
Shrager
J
,
Rizi
RR
:
A small animal model of regional alveolar ventilation using HP 3He MRI1.
Acad Radiol
2004
;
11
:
1171
9
19.
Walker
TG
,
Happer
W
:
Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas nuclei.
Rev Mod Phys
1997
;
69
:
629
42
20.
Denison
DM
,
Morgan
MD
,
Millar
AB
:
Estimation of regional gas and tissue volumes of the lung in supine man using computed tomography.
Thorax
1986
;
41
:
620
8
21.
Gattinoni
L
,
Caironi
P
,
Pelosi
P
,
Goodman
LR
:
What has computed tomography taught us about the acute respiratory distress syndrome?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2001
;
164
:
1701
11
22.
Matthews
JN
,
Altman
DG
,
Campbell
MJ
,
Royston
P
:
Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.
BMJ
1990
;
300
:
230
5
23.
Bachofen
H
,
Gehr
P
,
Weibel
ER
:
Alterations of mechanical properties and morphology in excised rabbit lungs rinsed with a detergent.
J Appl Physiol
1979
;
47
:
1002
10
24.
Hsia
CC
,
Hyde
DM
,
Ochs
M
,
Weibel
ER
;
ATS/ERS Joint Task Force on Quantitative Assessment of Lung Structure
:
An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: Standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2010
;
181
:
394
418
25.
Smaldone
GC
,
Mitzner
W
:
Unresolved mysteries.
J Appl Physiol
2012
;
113
:
1945
7
26.
Woods
JC
,
Choong
CK
,
Yablonskiy
DA
,
Bentley
J
,
Wong
J
,
Pierce
JA
,
Cooper
JD
,
Macklem
PT
,
Conradi
MS
,
Hogg
JC
:
Hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI and histology in pulmonary emphysema.
Magn Reson Med
2006
;
56
:
1293
300
27.
Lum
H
,
Huang
I
,
Mitzner
W
:
Morphological evidence for alveolar recruitment during inflation at high transpulmonary pressure.
J Appl Physiol
1990
;
68
:
2280
6
28.
Hubmayr
RD
,
Walters
BJ
,
Chevalier
PA
,
Rodarte
JR
,
Olson
LE
:
Topographical distribution of regional lung volume in anesthetized dogs.
J Appl Physiol
1983
;
54
:
1048
56
29.
Reber
A
,
Engberg
G
,
Sporre
B
,
Kviele
L
,
Rothen
HU
,
Wegenius
G
,
Nylund
U
,
Hedenstierna
G
:
Volumetric analysis of aeration in the lungs during general anaesthesia.
Br J Anaesth
1996
;
76
:
760
6
30.
Gil
J
,
Weibel
ER
:
Morphological study of pressure-volume hysteresis in rat lungs fixed by vascular perfusion.
Respir Physiol
1972
;
15
:
190
213
31.
Hajari
AJ
,
Yablonskiy
DA
,
Sukstanskii
AL
,
Quirk
JD
,
Conradi
MS
,
Woods
JC
:
Morphometric changes in the human pulmonary acinus during inflation.
J Appl Physiol
2012
;
112
:
937
43
32.
Namati
E
,
Thiesse
J
,
de Ryk
J
,
McLennan
G
:
Alveolar dynamics during respiration: Are the pores of Kohn a pathway to recruitment?
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
2008
;
38
:
572
8
33.
Kaczka
DW
,
Cao
K
,
Christensen
GE
,
Bates
JH
,
Simon
BA
:
Analysis of regional mechanics in canine lung injury using forced oscillations and 3D image registration.
Ann Biomed Eng
2011
;
39
:
1112
24
34.
McGee
KP
,
Mariappan
YK
,
Hubmayr
RD
,
Carter
RE
,
Bao
Z
,
Levin
DL
,
Manduca
A
,
Ehman
RL
:
Magnetic resonance assessment of parenchymal elasticity in normal and edematous, ventilator-injured lung.
J Appl Physiol
2012
;
113
:
666
76
35.
Gajic
O
,
Dara
SI
,
Mendez
JL
,
Adesanya
AO
,
Festic
E
,
Caples
SM
,
Rana
R
,
St Sauver
JL
,
Lymp
JF
,
Afessa
B
,
Hubmayr
RD
:
Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
Crit Care Med
2004
;
32
:
1817
24
36.
Muscedere
JG
,
Mullen
JB
,
Gan
K
,
Slutsky
AS
:
Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1994
;
149
:
1327
34
37.
Tremblay
L
,
Valenza
F
,
Ribeiro
SP
,
Li
J
,
Slutsky
AS
:
Injurious ventilatory strategies increase cytokines and c-fos m-RNA expression in an isolated rat lung model.
J Clin Invest
1997
;
99
:
944
52
38.
Severgnini
P
,
Selmo
G
,
Lanza
C
,
Chiesa
A
,
Frigerio
A
,
Bacuzzi
A
,
Dionigi
G
,
Novario
R
,
Gregoretti
C
,
de Abreu
MG
,
Schultz
MJ
,
Jaber
S
,
Futier
E
,
Chiaranda
M
,
Pelosi
P
:
Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function.
Anesthesiology
2013
;
118
:
1307
21
39.
Carvalho
AR
,
Jandre
FC
,
Pino
AV
,
Bozza
FA
,
Salluh
JI
,
Rodrigues
R
,
Soares
JH
,
Giannella-Neto
A
:
Effects of descending positive end-expiratory pressure on lung mechanics and aeration in healthy anaesthetized piglets.
Crit Care
2006
;
10
:
R122
40.
Duggan
M
,
McCaul
CL
,
McNamara
PJ
,
Engelberts
D
,
Ackerley
C
,
Kavanagh
BP
:
Atelectasis causes vascular leak and lethal right ventricular failure in uninjured rat lungs.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2003
;
167
:
1633
40
41.
Tsuchida
S
,
Engelberts
D
,
Peltekova
V
,
Hopkins
N
,
Frndova
H
,
Babyn
P
,
McKerlie
C
,
Post
M
,
McLoughlin
P
,
Kavanagh
BP
:
Atelectasis causes alveolar injury in nonatelectatic lung regions.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2006
;
174
:
279
89
42.
Jaber
S
,
Coisel
Y
,
Chanques
G
,
Futier
E
,
Constantin
JM
,
Michelet
P
,
Beaussier
M
,
Lefrant
JY
,
Allaouchiche
B
,
Capdevila
X
,
Marret
E
:
A multicentre observational study of intra-operative ventilatory management during general anaesthesia: Tidal volumes and relation to body weight.
Anaesthesia
2012
;
67
:
999
1008
43.
Silva
MF
,
Zin
WA
,
Saldiva
PH
:
Airspace configuration at different transpulmonary pressures in normal and paraquat-induced lung injury in rats.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1998
;
158
:
1230
4
44.
Hedenstierna
G
,
Tokics
L
,
Lundquist
H
,
Andersson
T
,
Strandberg
A
,
Brismar
B
:
Phrenic nerve stimulation during halothane anesthesia. Effects of atelectasis.
Anesthesiology
1994
;
80
:
751
60