Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Education|
January 1988
Sufentanil Analgesia Following Cesarean Section: Epidural Versus Intravenous Administration
S. E. COHEN, M.B., CH.B., F.F.A.R.C.S.;
S. E. COHEN, M.B., CH.B., F.F.A.R.C.S.
*Professor of Anesthesia (Clinical); Director, Obstetric Anesthesia.
Search for other works by this author on:
S. TAN, M.D.;
S. TAN, M.D.
†Fellow in Obstetric Anesthesia.
Search for other works by this author on:
P. F. WHITE, M.D., PH.D.
P. F. WHITE, M.D., PH.D.
‡Associate Professor of Anesthesia; Chief, Outpatient Anesthesia Service.
Search for other works by this author on:
Anesthesiology January 1988, Vol. 68, 129–133.
Citation
S. E. COHEN, S. TAN, P. F. WHITE; Sufentanil Analgesia Following Cesarean Section: Epidural Versus Intravenous Administration. Anesthesiology 1988; 68:129–133 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198801000-00023
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
A Randomized Study of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Meperidine during Labor : Impact on Cesarean Delivery Rate
Anesthesiology (December 1998)
Intrathecal Sufentanil for Labor Analgesia Does Not Cause a Sympathectomy
Anesthesiology (October 1997)
Spinal versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Severely Preeclamptic Patients : A Retrospective Survey
Anesthesiology (May 1999)
Clinical Effects and Maternal and Fetal Plasma Concentrations of Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Cesarean Section
Anesthesiology (June 1995)
Phenylephrine Added to Prophylactic Ephedrine Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section
Anesthesiology (September 2001)
