Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Correspondence|
September 1990
Train-of-four Ratio Is Not Always Independent of Stimulating Current
Mitchel B. Sosis, M.D., Ph.D.
Mitchel B. Sosis, M.D., Ph.D.
Search for other works by this author on:
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Department of Anesthesiology Rush-Presbyterian—St. Luke's Medical Center Chicago, Illinois 60612
Anesthesiology September 1990, Vol. 73, 573.
Citation
Mitchel B. Sosis; Train-of-four Ratio Is Not Always Independent of Stimulating Current. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:573 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199009000-00039
Download citation file:
Close
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Differences of Recovery from Rocuronium-induced Deep Paralysis in Response to Small Doses of Sugammadex between Elderly and Nonelderly Patients
Anesthesiology (November 2018)
Reversal of Vecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade with Low-dose Sugammadex at Train-of-four Count of Four: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anesthesiology (September 2017)
Reversal of Partial Neuromuscular Block and the Ventilatory Response to Hypoxia: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers
Anesthesiology (September 2019)
Neostigmine Administration after Spontaneous Recovery to a Train-of-Four Ratio of 0.9 to 1.0: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Neuromuscular and Clinical Recovery
Anesthesiology (January 2018)
Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
Anesthesiology (November 2018)
