Background

The current study was performed to determine whether volatile anesthetics may include as part of their action in the central nervous system the depression of presynaptic transmitter release by alteration in intrasynaptic [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i).

Methods

Guinea pig cerebrocortical synaptosomes were studied at 37 degrees C suspended in control buffer solution containing 1.3 mM external [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]e). Spectrofluorometric assays were used to monitor [Ca2+]i with the Ca(2+)-sensitive fluorophore Fura-2 and to monitor glutamate release with an enzyme-coupled assay that produced the fluorescent product nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. To activate the increase in [Ca2+]i and glutamate release, synaptosomes were depolarized by abruptly increasing external [K+] from 5 to 35 mM. Responses were determined in solutions equilibrated with approximately 1 or 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane, enflurane, or halothane and also in solutions with decreased [Ca2+]e (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mM).

Results

Although they had no action on basal behavior, the anesthetics depressed the K(+)-depolarization-induced increase in both [Ca2+]i and glutamate release in a dose-dependent fashion. The [Ca2+]i transient was inhibited by 13-21% per MAC, and glutamate release was depressed 14-28% per MAC. The depression of both [Ca2+]i and glutamate release caused by 2.5% isoflurane, 3.4% enflurane, and 1.5% halothane could be reproduced by a reduction in [Ca2+]e to 0.2-0.4 mM.

Conclusions

In this setting, isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane decrease [Ca2+]i in a manner consistent with inhibition of Ca2+ entry, possibly by specific voltage-gated neuronal Ca2+ channels. This decrease in [Ca2+]i is sufficient to account for all or most of the associated decrease in glutamate release.

Methods: Guinea pig cerebrocortical synaptosomes were studied at 37 degrees Celsius suspended in control buffer solution containing 1.3 mM external [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]e). Spectrofluorometric assays were used to monitor [Ca2+]iwith the Calcium2+ -sensitive fluorophore Fura-2 and to monitor glutamate release with an enzyme-coupled assay that produced the fluorescent product nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. To activate the increase in [Ca2+]iand glutamate release, synaptosomes were depolarized by abruptly increasing external [Potassium sup +] from 5 to 35 mM. Responses were determined in solutions equilibrated with approximately 1 or 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane, enflurane, or halothane and also in solutions with decreased [Ca2+]e(0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mM).

Results: Although they had no action on basal behavior, the anesthetics depressed the Potassium sup + -depolarization-induced increase in both [Ca2+]iand glutamate release in a dose-dependent fashion. The [Ca2+]itransient was inhibited by 13-21% per MAC, and glutamate release was depressed 14-28% per MAC. The depression of both [Ca2+]iand glutamate release caused by 2.5% isoflurane, 3.4% enflurane, and 1.5% halothane could be reproduced by a reduction in [Ca sup 2+]eto 0.2-0.4 mM.

Conclusions: In this setting, isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane decrease [Ca2+]iin a manner consistent with inhibition of Calcium2+ entry, possibly by specific voltage-gated neuronal Calcium sup 2+ channels. This decrease in [Ca2+]iis sufficient to account for all or most of the associated decrease in glutamate release.

Key words: Anesthetics, volatile: enflurane; halothane; isoflurane. Brain: synaptosomes. Ions: calcium. Neurotransmitters: glutamate.

THE primary effect of volatile anesthetics has been attributed to alteration of synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. Although some detailed descriptions have been made of anesthetic effects on postsynaptic neuronal sites, particularly the anesthetic enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acidA-mediated inhibitory Chlorine sup - currents, [1,2]fewer studies have defined presynaptic effects. In the absence of decreased postsynaptic glutamate sensitivity, the observed decrease in glutamate-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potentials by anesthetics in central neurons has been attributed a presynaptic action, possibly mediated by inhibition of Calcium2+ entry. [3-5]In isolated cerebrocortical synaptosomes, Calcium2+ influx through voltage-gated Calcium2+ channels (VGCC) leads to an increase in intrasynaptic [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) and, subsequently, exocytotic secretion of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. [6-9]In mammalian neuronal systems a variety of VGCC (N-, P- and Q-type) appear to contribute to synaptic release processes in various tissues. [9-16]The ability of volatile anesthetics to depress Calcium2+ currents in the myocardium has been recognized for more than a decade, [17,18]particularly via the dihydropyridine-sensitive long-lasting, high-threshold (L-type) VGCC. [19,20]Recently, the N-type VGCC in hippocampal cells has been shown to be depressed by volatile agents. [21]In contrast, the P-type VGCC, which appears to mediate a large fraction of synaptosomal Calcium2+ entry in the central nervous system, [16]may be far less affected by the volatile anesthetic agents. [22]To determine whether presynaptic Calcium2+ entry is significantly altered by volatile anesthetics and is associated with depressed transmitter release, we examined the effects of isoflurane, enflurane and halothane on voltage-activated Calcium2+ influx and glutamate release from isolated cerebral cortex synaptosomes. Depending on the correlation between Calcium2+ entry and glutamate release, these observations might also provide insights into other processes that may be altered by anesthetics, such as Calcium2+ elimination (by the plasmalemmal Calcium2+ -adenosine triphosphatase or Sodium sup + -Calcium2+ exchanger), intracellular Calcium2+ mobilization, and Calcium2+ interaction with vesicular release proteins (such as synaptotagmin, synapsin, and syntaxin [23]).

Synaptosome Preparation

For each day's experiments, synaptosomes were prepared by a modification of the method of Nicholls [24]and Bowman et al. [9]Following protocols approved by the University of Virginia Animal Research Committee, 250-350-g Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were killed by cervical dislocation, or by cardiac excision after anesthesia with 0.1 g/kg pentobarbital given by intraperitoneal injection. Cerebral cortexes (approximately 1 g) were rapidly excised, cooled to 0 degree Celsius, homogenized in 9 ml 0.3 M sucrose, and centrifuged at 1,500g for 10 min. The pellet obtained was centrifuged at 1,500g for 10 min again after resuspension in approximately the original volume of 0.3 M sucrose. The combined supernatants were centrifuged at 9,000g for 20 min and the pellet (crude synaptosome fraction) was resuspended in 5 ml 0.3 M sucrose. Aliquots (2 ml) of this suspension were layered on 5 ml 0.8 M sucrose and centrifuged at 9,000g for 30 min. Particles dispersed in 0.8 M sucrose solution were diluted with an equal volume of ice-cold incubation medium containing (in millimolar concentrations) NaCl 125, KCl 5, NaHCO35, Na2HPO41.2, MgCl21, glucose 10, and hydroxyethylpiperazine-ethane sulfonic acid 20, at pH 7.4 and centrifuged at 16,000g for 20 min. The pellet (purified synaptosome fraction) was resuspended in incubation medium.

Measurements of intracellular Calcium2+ and glutamate release were performed using a luminescence spectrofluorometer (LS-50, Perkin-Elmer Ltd., Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, England). During each experiment, the cuvette temperature was thermostatically regulated at 37 degrees Celsius with magnetic stirring of the synaptosome suspension to ensure adequate mixing.

Calcium sup 2+ Measurements

The free Calcium2+ concentration inside the synaptosomes ([Ca sup 2+]i) was measured using the Calcium2+ -sensitive fluorophore Fura-2 and conventional excitation wavelength ratio methods. [9,25]The synaptosomal suspension was preincubated for 5 min at 37 degrees Celsius, followed by the addition of 100 micro Meter CaCl2, 16 micro Meter bovine serum albumin, and 1 micro Meter Fura-2/AM (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), which diffuses into the synaptosomes and remains there after hydrolysis of the acetoxymethyl (AM) groups. After 35 min, the synaptosomes were centrifuged for 2 min and washed twice with 2 ml fresh medium to eliminate residual Fura-2/AM. An aliquot of Fura-2/AM-loaded synaptosomes (containing approximately 1.34 mg protein) was then placed in a cuvette containing 2 ml medium to which CaCl2was added to achieve a final [Calcium2+] of 1.3 mM. Following standardized protocols, fluorescence was determined at 510 nm with an excitation wavelength switched between 340 or 380 nm; data points were collected every 1.89 s. One hundred seconds after the addition of Calcium2+, [Potassium sup +] was increased to 35 mM (by addition of 20 micro liter 3 M KCl) to depolarize the synaptosomes and initiate Calcium2+ influx. After 180 s, synaptosomes were made soluble with 1% (weight/volume) Triton X-100 to permit Calcium2+ entry and saturation of Fura-2/AM, followed by addition of ethylene-glycol-bis-(beta-aminoethyl ether) tetraacetic acid to a final concentration 7.5 mM to bind Calcium2+, thereby generating the maximum and minimum 340/380 fluorescence ratios, respectively. Based on the maximum and minimum ratios, a computer program then calculated the synaptosomal [Ca2+]ifrom fluorescence ratio measured during the 280-s experimental period. In control experiments, this technique was found to be insensitive to the anesthetics. Seven to 13 [Ca2+]iassays on different synaptosomal preparations were carried out for each anesthetic concentration.

Glutamate Release

Glutamate release was measured under identical conditions used for Calcium2+ influx, except for omission of Fura-2/AM loading and the addition of an enzyme-coupled assay using glutamate dehydrogenase as described by Nicholls and coworkers. [7,26]In the presence of glutamate dehydrogenase (50 U/ml), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and ketoglutarate are produced from NADP sup + (1 mM) and glutamate. NADPH fluorescence was excited at 340 nm and monitored at 460 nm (emission wavelength) as a measure of glutamate release. As in the Calcium2+ assay, glutamate release was activated by increase in Potassium sup + to 35 mM 100 s after the addition of Calcium2+ to the solution. The addition of KCl increased the osmolarity of the solution by approximately 20%, but control experiments in which an equivalent amount of NaCl was added showed neither an increase in [Ca2+]inor detectable glutamate release.

Because of the enzyme-coupled aspect of this assay, it requires time for reaction. The sudden increase in glutamate due to addition or release results in a measurable fluorescence signal that increases exponentially to a final value. For a standard enzyme reaction, velocity of substrate utilization (-dS/dt, where S = substrate, in this case glutamate) is given by: Equation 1where P = the product and Km= the substrate concentration at which 50% of the maximum velocity (Vmax) is obtained for a constant enzyme concentration. Because the glutamate concentration is much lower than Kmof glutamate dehydrogenase (approximately 120 micro Meter), the equation may be simplified to: Equation 2Thus the initial rate of NADPH production is proportional to the glutamate concentration ([S]), and any sudden increase in glutamate can be estimated from the initial slope of NADPH appearance. To assess both the linearity of the assay as well as the validity of the assumption, the fluorescence intensity (FI) was measured in response to the sudden increase in glutamate caused by the addition of a specified amount (0.25-7 nmol) to the incubation medium, which contained 50 U/ml glutamate dehydrogenase and 1 mM NADP sup + (Figure 1(A)). As predicted from enzyme kinetics, the increase in FI was an exponential function of time after the addition of glutamate with a time constant of approximately 190 s at each glutamate concentration, the final FI stabilizing after 800-900 s. To 7 nmol added glutamate, the initial slope was a linear function of the added glutamate and the resulting [glutamate] (Figure 1(B)). Unlike the calibration curves, which achieve a stable FI once the added glutamate is metabolized, the initial and subsequent ongoing synaptosomal glutamate release activated by KCl depolarization results in a slow, ongoing increase in FI after 900 s. Consequently, absolute value of FI at any point cannot be used as a measure of initial or total glutamate release. However, because the initial slope of FI is a linear function of added glutamate to 7 nmol, the initial glutamate released can still be estimated from the initial slope. Although a deconvolution of the FI response based on the time constant of the reaction permitted an estimate of ongoing glutamate release, this was not routinely performed. To provide for any variation in each assay, the change in FI slope resulting from the addition of 6 nmol glutamate at 900 s was used an internal calibration for that particular assay (see Figure 4, for example). Five to eight glutamate assays on different synaptosomal preparations were carried out for each anesthetic concentration. We also verified that this method of glutamate determination is insensitive to the volatile anesthetics.

Figure 1. Calibration for glutamate release. (A) Fluorescence intensity (FI) response at 460 nm (excitation at 340 nm) versus time with the sudden addition of glutamate (1-7 nmol) to the standard medium at 40 s, using an enzyme-coupled assay system using 50 U/ml glutamate dehydrogenase. FI increases because of the production of fluorescent product nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) from NADP sup + (1 mM) in the medium. According to standard enzyme kinetics, when Kmof the enzyme for the substrate (where Km= the substrate concentration at which 50% of the maximum velocity is obtained for a constant enzyme concentration) exceeds the substrate concentration by > 20-fold, the initial rate of enzyme reaction will be proportional to the substrate concentration. (B) The initial slope of FI increase at 460 nm for the addition of various amounts of glutamate. Circles = the slopes determined from A; squares = an additional experiment. The response is linear over the range studied.

Figure 1. Calibration for glutamate release. (A) Fluorescence intensity (FI) response at 460 nm (excitation at 340 nm) versus time with the sudden addition of glutamate (1-7 nmol) to the standard medium at 40 s, using an enzyme-coupled assay system using 50 U/ml glutamate dehydrogenase. FI increases because of the production of fluorescent product nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) from NADP sup + (1 mM) in the medium. According to standard enzyme kinetics, when Kmof the enzyme for the substrate (where Km= the substrate concentration at which 50% of the maximum velocity is obtained for a constant enzyme concentration) exceeds the substrate concentration by > 20-fold, the initial rate of enzyme reaction will be proportional to the substrate concentration. (B) The initial slope of FI increase at 460 nm for the addition of various amounts of glutamate. Circles = the slopes determined from A; squares = an additional experiment. The response is linear over the range studied.

Close modal

Figure 4. The effects of isoflurane on the KCl-induced Calcium2+ transient and glutamate release. (A) Calcium2+ transients in the absence and presence of isoflurane in the extrasynaptosomal medium, where isoflurane concentrations in solution have been equilibrated with either 1.3 or 2.5% isoflurane. Shown are responses at slow (left) and fast (right) time scales, respectively. (B) Changes in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence intensity (FI), representing the initial glutamate release in the presence of isoflurane. The small initial step in FI seen on KCl addition was occasionally seen with certain preparations and represented a mixing artifact, not glutamate-dependent production of NADPH.

Figure 4. The effects of isoflurane on the KCl-induced Calcium2+ transient and glutamate release. (A) Calcium2+ transients in the absence and presence of isoflurane in the extrasynaptosomal medium, where isoflurane concentrations in solution have been equilibrated with either 1.3 or 2.5% isoflurane. Shown are responses at slow (left) and fast (right) time scales, respectively. (B) Changes in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence intensity (FI), representing the initial glutamate release in the presence of isoflurane. The small initial step in FI seen on KCl addition was occasionally seen with certain preparations and represented a mixing artifact, not glutamate-dependent production of NADPH.

Close modal

Anesthetic Administration

Anesthetic effects were determined by incubation of the synaptosomes for 5 min before study in an assay solution preequilibrated with the specified anesthetic concentration. Solutions were preequilibrated for 20 min by bubbling with anesthetic-containing filtered air from a calibrated vaporizer, whereas control solutions were bubbled with filtered air only. Incubation and assays were carried out in cuvettes in which an appropriate concentration of anesthetic-containing air continually flowed through the head space to prevent loss of anesthetic from the medium to the atmosphere. The Calcium2+ influx or glutamate release assay were performed with approximately equipotent anesthetic concentrations: 0.75 or 1.5% halothane; 1.3 or 2.5% isoflurane; 1.7 or 3.4% enflurane; representing one or two times human minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), or approximately 0.8 and approximately 1.6 times guinea pig MAC. [27]The aqueous phase anesthetic concentrations at 37 degrees Celsius as determined by gas chromatography are listed in Table 1and represent 89-105% of the value predicted from published partition coefficients. [28].

Table 1. Anesthetic Concentrations in Assay Solution at 37 degrees Celsius Determined by Gas Chromatographic Analysis

Table 1. Anesthetic Concentrations in Assay Solution at 37 degrees Celsius Determined by Gas Chromatographic Analysis
Table 1. Anesthetic Concentrations in Assay Solution at 37 degrees Celsius Determined by Gas Chromatographic Analysis

To decrease the amount of Calcium2+ entry and thereby assess the relation between the Calcium2+ transient and glutamate release, assays were also performed in the presence of 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 micro Meter Calcium2+, achieved by addition of smaller quantities of CaCl2to the synaptosome-containing assay solution before the KCl-induced activation.

Statistical Analysis

Comparison among the absolute values of control and the two anesthetic concentrations and were performed using analysis of variance and the Fisher's protected least significant difference test for planned comparisons (Statview, Abacus Software, Berkeley, CA). Significance of the concentration dependence of the effects was determined by calculating the slope and its estimated error (least-squares regression analysis) using the absolute values at 0, 1, and 2 MAC of anesthetic. Values were also calculated as percent of control for any given days experiments (one to three assays), and tested versus 100% by an unpaired t test.

Calcium sup 2+ Dependence of Synaptosomal Responses

The increase in [Ca2+]ias well as glutamate release from these isolated synaptosomes was clearly dependent on [Calcium2+] in the external medium ([Ca2+]e). The depolarization induced by increasing [Potassium sup +] from 5 to 35 mM produced a characteristically rapid peak (< 10 s) of [Ca2+]iof 100-150 nM above the basal concentration (120-200 nM), followed by a partial decrease to a stable plateau phase of 50-80 nM above the basal [Ca2+]i(Figure 2(A)). In nominally Calcium2+ -free solutions, there was never an increase in [Ca2+]i. In such cases, the contaminant [Ca2+] sub e in the absence of a Calcium2+ chelating agent was typically in the range of 2-4 micro Meter.

Figure 2. Intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) and glutamate release in response to depolarization of synaptosomes (1.34 mg protein) by increasing Potassium sup + from 5 to 35 mM. (A) The [Ca2+]ichanges as determined by the Fura-2/AM fluorescence ratio method. In the presence of 1.3 mM Calcium2+, a large initial transient was observed on the increase in external [Potassium sup +]. The large initial transient subsequently decreased to a plateau that was typically half that of the initial transient. In the absence of added Calcium2+ (nominally Calcium2+ -free), no Calcium2+ transient is observed. (B) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence response to added KCl in the presence of 1.3 mM Calcium2+ and in nominally Calcium2+ -free solution. The initial slope of the fluorescence response in 1.3 mM Calcium2+ gives an estimate of the initial glutamate release of 1.5 nmol, based on the equivalence of its slope to one fourth of the slope observed on addition of the internal standard of 6 nmol (done at 900 s and not shown in the tracing; see Figure 4, for example).

Figure 2. Intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) and glutamate release in response to depolarization of synaptosomes (1.34 mg protein) by increasing Potassium sup + from 5 to 35 mM. (A) The [Ca2+]ichanges as determined by the Fura-2/AM fluorescence ratio method. In the presence of 1.3 mM Calcium2+, a large initial transient was observed on the increase in external [Potassium sup +]. The large initial transient subsequently decreased to a plateau that was typically half that of the initial transient. In the absence of added Calcium2+ (nominally Calcium2+ -free), no Calcium2+ transient is observed. (B) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence response to added KCl in the presence of 1.3 mM Calcium2+ and in nominally Calcium2+ -free solution. The initial slope of the fluorescence response in 1.3 mM Calcium2+ gives an estimate of the initial glutamate release of 1.5 nmol, based on the equivalence of its slope to one fourth of the slope observed on addition of the internal standard of 6 nmol (done at 900 s and not shown in the tracing; see Figure 4, for example).

Close modal

In the presence of external Calcium2+, the release of glutamate was evident from the increase in NADPH FI after KCl-induced depolarization, where the initial slope is proportional to the amount of the initial glutamate release (Figure 2(B)). The slope is subsequently maintained by ongoing glutamate release. Based on the FI slope resulting from addition of 6 nmol glutamate (tracing at 900 s not shown), the initial glutamate release was estimated as 1.5 nmol glutamate from the initial slope of the curve. In 30-40% of experiments, a modest baseline of glutamate release before depolarization was present as evidenced by a slightly positive slope of FI. In these cases, KCl-independent release of glutamate was subtracted from KCl-dependent release before tabulation. Depolarization in nominally Calcium2+ -free solution did not activate glutamate release, indicating that Calcium2+ influx is responsible for the observed increase.

If instead of 1.3 mM or nominally zero Calcium2+, an intermediate [Ca2+]ewas used, [Ca2+]itransients of intermediate amplitude were obtained, and glutamate release was also reduced below the control (1.3 mM) concentration. Figure 3(A) presents the effects of 25-400 micro Meter [Ca2+]eon the amplitude of the [Ca2+]itransient and plateau initiated by the Potassium sup + -induced depolarization. A modest reduction occurred with 400 micro Meter [Ca2+]e, with smaller [Ca2+]itransients evident in the presence of the lower [Ca2+]e. In spite of various complicating considerations, the decrease in the [Ca2+]itransient was a simple linear function of the log of [Ca2+]e(Figure 3(B)). This relation would be anticipated if the [Ca2+]itransients were a linear function of inward Calcium2+ current amplitude, and assuming current can be approximated by a simple conductance model, current will be proportional to the Calcium2+ equilibrium potential, which is proportional to log ([Ca2+]e/[Ca sup 2+]i). The glutamate release, as assessed by the initial slope of increasing FI, also decreased as [Ca2+]ewas decreased (Figure 3(C)). Figure 3(D) presents the dose-dependent depression in glutamate release, as well as in the [Ca2+]itransient, for the reductions in [Ca2+]e. With a reduction in [Ca2+]e, glutamate release was typically more depressed than was the Ca2+itransient. Neither the basal [Ca2+]inor the basal glutamate release before depolarization was altered by the decreased [Ca2+]e(data not shown).

Figure 3. Intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) and the glutamate release in response to KCl depolarization in the presence of varied [Calcium2+] in the external medium ([Ca2+]e). (A) Changes in [Ca2+]ifrom one synaptosomal preparation in the presence of the varying [Ca2+]eindicated. (B) The dependence of the net [Ca2+]itransient on [Ca2+]e(ext[Ca]). Each point represents the mean of three to five measurements. (C) Changes in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence intensity (FI) representing glutamate release with varied [Ca2+]e, in which the decreased slope of the FI increase is proportional to the magnitude of glutamate release. (D) Fractional change in the Calcium2+ transient and glutamate release plotted as a fraction of the control level observed in presence of 1.3 mM [Ca2+]e.

Figure 3. Intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) and the glutamate release in response to KCl depolarization in the presence of varied [Calcium2+] in the external medium ([Ca2+]e). (A) Changes in [Ca2+]ifrom one synaptosomal preparation in the presence of the varying [Ca2+]eindicated. (B) The dependence of the net [Ca2+]itransient on [Ca2+]e(ext[Ca]). Each point represents the mean of three to five measurements. (C) Changes in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) fluorescence intensity (FI) representing glutamate release with varied [Ca2+]e, in which the decreased slope of the FI increase is proportional to the magnitude of glutamate release. (D) Fractional change in the Calcium2+ transient and glutamate release plotted as a fraction of the control level observed in presence of 1.3 mM [Ca2+]e.

Close modal

Anesthetic Inhibition of KCl-evoked Increase in Intrasynaptic [Calcium sup 2+] and Glutamate Release

The effect of isoflurane on KCl-induced [Ca2+]ichanges and glutamate release are shown in Figure 4. Both the [Ca2+]itransients and the initial slope of the glutamate assay were reduced by isoflurane, with a greater effect present at the higher concentration. The effects of clinically comparable concentrations of halothane (0.75 and 1.5%), enflurane (1.7 and 3.4%) and isoflurane (1.3 and 2.5%) caused quantitatively similar decreases in the peak and plateau [Ca2+]iresponse (Table 2) and in glutamate release (Table 3). Basal [Ca2+]iand glutamate release were not altered by the anesthetics. The changes in [Ca2+]iand secretion of glutamate induced by three anesthetics were also documented by the regression analysis. A significant negative slope of peak [Ca2+]itransient and initial glutamate release versus anesthetic concentration was present for all three anesthetics. The concentration dependence, when calculated for equivalent potency (1 or 2 MAC), was similar for all three agents: Calcium2+ transients were reduced 11-14% per MAC, and glutamate release was reduced about 20-25% per MAC.

Table 2. Synaptosomal Calcium2+ Changes Induced by KCl Depolarization

Table 2. Synaptosomal Calcium2+ Changes Induced by KCl Depolarization
Table 2. Synaptosomal Calcium2+ Changes Induced by KCl Depolarization

Table 3. Synaptosomal Glutamate Release

Table 3. Synaptosomal Glutamate Release
Table 3. Synaptosomal Glutamate Release

For the various anesthetics and for [Ca2+]eequal to 100-600 micro Meter, Figure 5plots the quantity of glutamate release as a fraction of control (Qglut/Qglut-control) versus the peak [Ca sup 2+]itransient, also expressed as a fraction of control ([Ca2+]i/[Ca2+]i-control), where the control values were those observed in 1.3 mM [Ca2+]ein the absence of anesthetic. The mean percent same-day control values are plotted. If glutamate release is a simple linear function of [Ca2+]i, then the points should fall on the line of unity (n = 1). Instead, the fractional reduction in glutamate release is slightly greater than that for [Ca2+]i. Assuming a simple model for Calcium2+ -dependent glutamate release in which n Calcium2+ ions induce exocytosis, then: Equation 3where n = the cooperativity of the Calcium2+. In general, the points defined for reduced [Ca2+]eas well as for the three anesthetics fall in the range of the lines defined by n = 1 and n = 2 (Figure 5).

Figure 5. The change in glutamate release versus the change in intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) transient observed in the presence of 1 or 2 MAC anesthetics or with decreased external [Calcium2+] (600, 400, 200, and 100 micro Meter, as indicated), where values are expressed as a fraction of the 1.3 mM Calcium2+ control values. The lines indicate the response anticipated if glutamate release is strictly a linear function of [Calcium2+] (n = 1) or if it is a function of a higher power of [Ca2+]i(n = 2 or n = 3)--that is, if two or three Calcium2+ are required to bind to a site responsible for activation of glutamate release, according to Equation 3

Figure 5. The change in glutamate release versus the change in intrasynaptosomal [Calcium2+] ([Ca2+]i) transient observed in the presence of 1 or 2 MAC anesthetics or with decreased external [Calcium2+] (600, 400, 200, and 100 micro Meter, as indicated), where values are expressed as a fraction of the 1.3 mM Calcium2+ control values. The lines indicate the response anticipated if glutamate release is strictly a linear function of [Calcium2+] (n = 1) or if it is a function of a higher power of [Ca2+]i(n = 2 or n = 3)--that is, if two or three Calcium2+ are required to bind to a site responsible for activation of glutamate release, according to Equation 3

Close modal

Although homogenization of brain tissue destroys neuronal cell bodies, the membranes of nerve endings reseal into synaptosomes, small functional sacs that retain not only synaptic vesicles but also the ability to secrete neurotransmitter in response to a depolarizing stimulus. Although they of course do not reflect intact neuronal function mediated by axonally transmitted depolarizations, synaptosomes have been widely used to elucidate the mechanisms of excitation-secretion coupling. In the mammalian cerebrocortical synaptosomes, the predominant excitatory neurotransmitter is glutamate, which is released when Calcium2+ entry is activated. [6-8,29]We found that isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane significantly depressed the synaptosomal [Ca2+]iincrease and release of glutamate evoked by a depolarizing concentration of Potassium sup + (35 mM). These effects on Calcium2+ are consistent with those reported by Kress et al. [30,31]in a variety of neuronal and some nonneuronal cells as well as with electrophysiologic evidence suggesting decreased neuronal glutamate release. [4,5]In the current study, solutions equilibrated with roughly equivalent clinical concentrations of isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane produced similar degrees of inhibition. As anticipated, the increase in synaptosomal Calcium2+ ([Ca2+]i) and the release of glutamate were both clearly dependent on [Ca2+]eand could be proportionally reduced by decreasing [Ca2+]e. Furthermore, effects on [Ca2+]iand glutamate release caused by a reduction in [Ca2+]eto 400 micro Meter (approximately 30% of the 1.3 mM control value) replicated the actions of the anesthetics. Because in nominally Calcium2+ -free solution, KCl depolarization by itself did not increase [Calcium2+], release of Calcium2+ from any intrasynaptosomal stores present did not appear to be occurring.

The observation that the decrease in the [Ca2+]itransient and greater decrease in glutamate release caused by the anesthetics can be closely duplicated by decreasing [Ca2+]ehas important implications. Because the relation between the reduced [Ca2+]itransient and glutamate release observed in the presence of the anesthetics can be seen in their absence with decreased [Ca2+]e, it is likely that the intrasynaptosomal mechanisms responsive to Calcium sup 2+, which ultimately progress to vesicle exocytosis, are not markedly altered by the anesthetics. If the synaptosomal proteins that bind Calcium sup 2+ and then foster vesicle fusion with the membrane were directly depressed (or enhanced) by anesthetics, then for a given [Ca2+]itransient, the glutamate release should be less than (or greater than) that observed when the transient was depressed by altering [Ca2+]e. If either the anesthetics or decreased [Ca2+]ealtered the resting [Ca2+]ibefore depolarization, then the behavior of various Calcium2+ sensitive regulatory enzymes might influence subsequent exocytosis. However, no such change in [Ca2+]ibehavior was noted. Consequently, the observed glutamate release from the synaptosomes can be largely explained by presuming the anesthetics mediate their action predominately by decreasing the abrupt increase in [Ca2+]iresponsible for activating the exocytotic cascade. Whether this interpretation can be applied to intact neurons requires verification.

The reduction of [Ca2+]itransient is associated with a slightly greater decrease in the quantity of glutamate release (Qglut/Qglut-control). The suggestion has been made that the process of exocytosis shows cooperativity in its Calcium2+ dependence such that two or more Calcium2+ must bind to specific sites. [11,13,32,33]Such a dependence is typical of that observed previously, in which transmitter release is reduced in proportion to some power function of the reduction in [Calcium2+]. The current observations using decreased [Ca2+]eare consistent with the presence of some degree of cooperativity (n > 1), and the anesthetics do not appear to markedly alter the degree of cooperativity.

Neurotransmitter release from neurons is mediated by Calcium sup 2+ entry into nerve terminals, activating a complex of proteins that cause fusion of the membrane of the transmitter-containing synaptic vesicle with the cell membrane, resulting in exocytosis. [23,34]Calcium2+ entry appears to be mediated by specific VGCC that are located near the active synaptosomal release zone of the neuronal membrane [32]and that are insensitive to the Calcium2+ -entry blockers such as the dihydropyridines classically active in the cardiovascular system. [35]Glutamate exocytosis appears to be coupled to Calcium2+ entry through several VGCC types including the N-, P- and Q-types, which are sensitive to omega-CTx-GVIA, omega-Aga IVA, and omega-CTx-MVIIC, respectively. [9,11,13-16,36,37]Although the exact VGCC may vary with the neuron, [38]Calcium2+ entry through VGCC appears to be of major importance because the depolarization-coupled glutamate release is much more efficient than that observed with the nonlocalized Calcium2+ entry due to the Calcium2+ ionophore ionomycin. [8,24,29]As with the L-type VGCC, volatile anesthetics appear to inhibit Calcium2+ currents in hippocampal neurons, [39]with a prominent effect observed on N-type and an unidentified, possibly P- or Q-type, VGCC. [21]In a separate investigation, P-type VGCC were interpreted as insensitive to volatile anesthetics, [22]although the authors' assumption that anesthetic potency (gas phase) is higher at room temperature may have underestimated the dose-requirement. Nevertheless, because of the cooperativity of Calcium2+ in mediating release, [11,13,32,33]even the 10% depression observed at approximately 1 MAC may result in more profound actions on presynaptic transmitter release.

Although association does not indicate causation, the results are consistent with a scheme in which inhibition of VGCC by volatile anesthetics accounts for inhibition of neurotransmitter release. However, anesthetic-mediated alterations in other aspects of cellular Calcium2+ regulation have been described that could contribute to the observed effects. [40,41]Volatile anesthetics have been shown to interfere with the sarcolemmal Calcium2+ -adenosine triphosphatase [42]as well as Sodium sup + -Calcium2+ exchange, [43]however, the role of these processes in regulating [Ca2+]iand influencing neurotransmitter release in neuronal cells remains undefined. In synaptosomes, depolarization with [Potassium sup +] of 55 mM or less appears to activate Calcium entry only through VGCC, and does not activate the Sodium sup + -Calcium2+ exchange pathway. [44]Although Ca2+istores in neuronal endoplasmic reticulum or "calciosomes" may also contribute to changes in neuronal [Ca2+]i, [45]neurotransmitter vesicle release appears to be mediated by local domains of Calcium2+ that has entered near active zones at presynaptic endings. [46]In pheochromocytoma cells, anesthetics depress depolarization mediated Calcium2+ entry and norepinephrine release, but do not decrease Calcium2+ release from intracellular stores nor the norepinephrine exocytosis caused by receptor-activated synthesis of inositol trisphosphate. [31]In the current study, no significant change in resting [Ca2+]iand glutamate release occurred in the presence of halothane, isoflurane or enflurane, suggesting that the anesthetics did not markedly alter the various Calcium2+ homeostatic pathways in resting synaptosomes. It is not possible to exclude indirect effects that might decrease the Calcium2+ transient, such as anesthetic depression of Sodium sup + influx on depolarization, which in turn could reduce Calcium2+ entry or enhance Calcium2+ elimination by the Sodium sup + -Calcium2+ exchanger. However, blockade of Sodium channels by tetrodotoxin does not inhibit glutamate release mediated by KCl-induced depolarization. [47].

The later phase of the NADPH FI assay contained components resulting from ongoing metabolism of the glutamate initially released and metabolism of glutamate released because of the ongoing analysis. Because these separate components could not be defined with certainty, the ongoing release was not quantitated. The plateau of the [Ca2+]iwas significantly reduced by anesthetics or decreased [Ca2+]e. However, the physiological relevance of the sustained depolarization and the associated ongoing glutamate release is unclear.

Although glutamate release stimulated by the KCl depolarization represents an artificial situation that imperfectly reflects in situ synaptic behavior, the anesthetic depression of glutamate release is consistent with the reported depression by halothane of the presynaptic glutamate release that generates excitatory postsynaptic potentials in thalamic [5]and hippocampal CA1 neurons. [48]It is unclear to what degree a 15-25% decrease in glutamate release, observed with 1 MAC anesthetic, could by itself interfere with the capacity of neurons to integrate and communicate information. However, when such an action on presynaptic endings is combined with the enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acidA-mediated inhibitory activity also caused by the volatile anesthetics, [1,2]the resulting effect should be more profound. Such combined actions might cause a greater alteration in behavior of individual neurons as well as in entire neural networks, and may also explain the differences in the quality of the anesthetic state as well as the neurophysiologic behavior produced by the volatile agents when compared with more pure gamma-aminobutyric acidA-activating agents (barbiturates and benzodiazepines). [49].

The authors thank Joseph J. Pancrazio, Ph.D., for helpful discussion and suggestions throughout this project.

1.
Jones MV, Brooks PA, Harrison NL: Enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid-activated Chlorine sup - currents in cultured rat hippocampal neurones by three volatile anesthetics. J Physiol (Lond) 449:279-293, 1992.
2.
Tanelian DL, Kosek P, Mody I, MacIver B: The role of the GABA sub A receptor/chloride channel complex in anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 78:757-776, 1993.
3.
Kullmann DM, Martin RL, Redman SJ: Reduction by general anaesthetics of group Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials and currents in the cat spinal cord. J Physiol (Lond) 412:277-296, 1989.
4.
Richards CD, Smaje JC: Anaesthetics depress the sensitivity of cortical neurones to L-glutamate. Br J Pharmacol 58:347-357, 1976.
5.
Sugiyama K, Muteki T, Shimoji K: Halothane-induced hyperpolarization and depression of postsynaptic potentials of guinea pig thalamic neurons in vitro. Brain Res 576:97-103, 1992.
6.
Nicholls DG, Sihra TS: Synaptosomes possess an exocytotic pool of glutamate. Nature 321:772-773, 1986.
7.
Nicholls DG, Sihra TS, Sanchez-Prieto J: Calcium-dependent and independent release of glutamate from synaptosomes monitored by continuous fluorometry. J Neurochem 49:50-57, 1987.
8.
McMahon HT, Nicholls DG: Transmitter glutamate release from isolated nerve terminals: Evidence for biphasic release and triggering by localized Calcium sup 2+. J Neurochem 56:86-94, 1991.
9.
Bowman D, Alexander S, Lodge D: Pharmacological characterisation of the calcium channels coupled to the plateau phase of KCl-induced intracellular free Calcium sup 2+ elevation in chicken and rat synaptosomes. Neuropharmacology 32:1195-1202, 1993.
10.
Hirning LD, Fox AP, McClesky EW, Olivera BM, Thayer ST, Miller RJ, Tsien RW: Dominant role of N-type Calcium sup 2+ channels in evoked release of norepinephrine from sympathetic neurons. Science 239:57-60, 1988.
11.
Takahashi T, Momiyama A: Different types of calcium channels mediate central synaptic transmission. Nature 366:156-158, 1993.
12.
Momiyama A, Takahashi T: Calcium channels responsible for potassium-induced transmitter release at rat cerebellar synapses. J Physiol (Lond) 476:197-202, 1994.
13.
Wu L-G, Saggau P: Pharmacological identification to two types of presynaptic voltage-dependent calcium channels at CA3-CA1 synapses of the hippocampus. J Neurosci 14:5613-5622, 1944.
14.
Wheeler DB, Randall A, Tsien RW: Roles of N-type and Q-type Calcium sup 2+ channels in supporting hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science 264:107-111, 1994.
15.
Turner TJ, Adams ME, Dunlap K: Calcium channels coupled to glutamate release identified by omega-Aga-IVA. Science 258:310-313, 1992.
16.
Mintz IM, Venema VJ, Swiderek KM, Lee TD, Bean BP, Adams ME: P-type calcium channels blocked by the spider toxin omega-Aga-IVA. Nature 353:827-829, 1992.
17.
Lynch C III, Vogel S, Sperelakis N: Halothane depression of myocardial slow action potentials. ANESTHESIOLOGY 55:360-368, 1981.
18.
Ikemoto Y, Yatani A, Arimura H, Yoshitake J: Reduction of the slow inward current of isolated rat ventricular cells by thiamylal and halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 29:583-586, 1985.
19.
Bosnjak Z, Supan FD, Rusch NJ: The effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on calcium current in isolated canine ventricular cells. ANESTHESIOLOGY 74:340-345, 1991.
20.
Terrar DA, Victory JGG: Isoflurane depresses membrane currents associated with contractions in myocytes isolated from guinea-pig ventricle. ANESTHESIOLOGY 69:742-749, 1988.
21.
Study RE: Isoflurane inhibits multiple voltage-gated calcium currents in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:104-116, 1994.
22.
Hall AC, Lieb WR, Franks NP: Insensitivity of P-type calcium channels to inhalational and intravenous general anesthetics. ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:117-123, 1994.
23.
Damer CK, Creutz CE: Secretory and synaptic vesicle membrane proteins and their possible roles in regulated exocytosis. Prog Neurobiol 43:511-536, 1994.
24.
Nicholls DG: Ion channels and the regulation of neurotransmitter glutamate release. Biochem Soc Trans 21:53-58, 1993.
25.
Grynkiewiez G, Poenie M, Tsien R: A new generation of Calcium sup 2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem 260:3440-3450, 1985.
26.
Nicholls DG: Calcium transport and proton electrochemical potential gradient in mitochodria from gunea-pig cerebral cortex and rat heart. Biochem J 170:511-522, 1978.
27.
Seifen AB, Kennedy RH, Bray JP, Seifen E: Estimation of minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC) for halothane, enflurane and isoflurane in spontaneously breathing guinea pigs. Lab Anim Sci 39:579-581, 1989.
28.
Renzi F, Waud BE: Partition coefficients of volatile anesthetics in Krebs' solution. ANESTHESIOLOGY 47:62-63, 1977.
29.
McMahon HT, Nicholls DG: The relationship between cytoplasmic free Calcium sup 2+ and the release of glutamate from synaptosomes. Biochem Soc Trans 18:375-377, 1989.
30.
Kress HG, Eckhardt-Wallasch H, Tas PWL, Koschel K: Volatile anesthetics depress the depolarization-induced cytoplasmic calcium rise in PC 12 cells. FEBS Lett 221:28-32, 1987.
31.
Kress HG, Muller J, Eisert A, Gilge U, Tas PW, Koschel K: Effects of volatile anesthetics on cytoplasmic Calcium sup 2+ signaling and transmitter release in a neural cell line. ANESTHESIOLOGY 74:309-319, 1991.
32.
Augustine GJ, Charlton MP, Smith SJ: Calcium action in synaptic transmitter action. Annu Rev Neurosci 10:633-653, 1987.
33.
Mulkeen D, Anwyl R, Rowan M: The effects of external calcium on long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampal slice. Brain Res 447:234-238, 1988.
34.
Geppert M, Goda Y, Hammer RE, Li C, Rosahl TW, Stevens CF, Sudhof TC: Synaptotagmin I: A major Calcium sup 2+ sensor for transmitter release at a central synapse. Cell 79:717-727, 1994.
35.
Stanley EF, Atrakchi AH: Calcium currents recorded from a vertebrate presynaptic nerve terminal are resistant to the dihydropyridine nifedipine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:9683-9687, 1990.
36.
Mori Y, Friedrich T, Kim M-S, Mikami A, Nakai J, Ruth P, Bosse E, Hofmann F, Flockerzi V, Furuichi T, Mikoshiba K, Imoto K, Tanabe T, Numa S: Primary structure and functional expression from a complementary DNA of a brain calcium channel. Nature 350:398-402, 1991.
37.
Luebke JI, Dunlap K, Turner TJ: Multiple calcium-channel types control glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Neuron 11:895-902, 1993.
38.
Regan LJ, Sah DWY, Bean BP: Calcium sup 2+ channels in rat central and peripheral neurons: High-threshold current resistant to dihydropyridine blockers and omega-conotoxin. Neuron 6:269-280, 1991.
39.
Krnjevic K, Puil E: Halothane suppresses slow inward currents in hippocampal slices. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 166:1570-1575, 1988.
40.
Pocock G, Richards CD: The action of volatile anesthetics on stimulus-secretion coupling in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Br J Pharmacol 95:209-217, 1988.
41.
Pocock G, Richards C: Cellular mechanisms in general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 66:116-128, 1991.
42.
Kosk-Kosicka D, Roszczynska G: Inhibition of plasma membrane Calcium sup 2+ -ATPase activity by volatile anesthetics. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:774-780, 1993.
43.
Haworth RA, Goknur AB, Berkoff HA: Inhibition of Sodium-Calcium exchange by general anesthetics. Circ Res 65:1021-1028, 1989.
44.
Taglialatela M, Di Renzo G, Annunziato L: Sodium sup + -Calcium sup 2+ exchange activity in central nerve endings: I. Ionic conditions that discriminate sup 45 Calcium sup 2+ uptake through the exchanger from that occurring through voltage-operated Calcium sup 2+ channels. Mol Pharmacol 38:385-392, 1990.
45.
Rossier MF, Putney JW Jr: The identity of the calcium-storing, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive organelle in non-muscle cells: Calciosome, endoplasmic reticulum . . . or both? Trends Neurosci 14:310-314, 1991.
46.
Llinas R, Sugimori M, Silver RB: Microdomains of high calcium concentration in a presynaptic terminal. Science 256:677-679, 1992.
47.
Romano-Silva MA, Ribeiro-Santos, Ribeiro AM, Gomez MV, Diniz CR, Cordeiro MN, Brammer MJ: Rat cortical synaptosomes have more than one mechanism for Calcium sup 2+ entry linked to rapid glutamate release: Studies using Phoneutria nigriventer toxin PhTX2 and potassium depolarization. Biochem J 296:313-319, 1993.
48.
Perouansky M, Baranov D, Yaari Y: Halothane effects on glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:A1474, 1994.
49.
Kendig JJ, Gibbs LM: The GABA sub A receptor in anesthesia: Isoflurane (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:A1477, 1994.