Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
April 2001
IS A CSE TECHNIQUE BETTER THAN A STANDARD EPIDURAL TECHNIQUE FOR PARTURIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS? : A29 (Poster 23)
Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
Anesthesiology April 2001, Vol. 94, NA.
Citation
R. Farragher, L. C. Tsen; IS A CSE TECHNIQUE BETTER THAN A STANDARD EPIDURAL TECHNIQUE FOR PARTURIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS? : A29 (Poster 23). Anesthesiology 2001; 94:NA doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200104001-00029
Download citation file:
62
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
A Randomized Study of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Meperidine during Labor : Impact on Cesarean Delivery Rate
Anesthesiology (December 1998)
A Comparison of the 24-Gauge Sprotte ® and Gertie Marx ® Spinal Needles for Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia during Labor
Anesthesiology (September 2002)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Traditional with Two “Mobile” Epidural Techniques: Anesthetic and Analgesic Efficacy
Anesthesiology (December 2002)
Tranexamic Acid Reduces Intraoperative Blood Loss in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Scoliosis Surgery
Anesthesiology (April 2005)
