Background

A low concentration of lidocaine (10 microM) has been shown to reduce anoxic damage in vitro. The current study examined the effect of low-dose lidocaine on infarct size in rats when administered before transient focal cerebral isehemia.

Methods

Male Wistar rats (weight, 280-340 g) were anesthetized with isoflurane, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. After surgical preparation, animals were assigned to lidocaine 2-day (n = 10), vehicle 2-day (n 12), lidocaine 7-day (n = 13), and vehicle 7-day (n = 14) groups. A 1.5-mg/kg bolus dose of ildocaine was injected intravenously 30 mm before isehemia in the lidocaine 2-day and 7-day groups. Thereafter, an infusion was initiated at a rate of 2 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) until 60 min of reperfusion after isehemia. Rats were subjected to 90 min of focal cerebral isehemia using the intraluminal suture method. Infarct size was determined by image analysis of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride-stained sections at 48 h or hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections 7 days after reperfusion. Neurologic outcome and body weight loss were also evaluated.

Results

The infarct size was significantly smaller in the lidocaine 2-day group (185.0+/-43.7 mm3) than in the vehicle 2-day group (261.3+/-45.8 mm3, P < 0.01). The reduction in the size of the infarct in the lidocaine 7-day group (130.4+/-62.9 mm3) was also significant compared with the vehicle 7-day group (216.6+/-73.6 mm3, P < 0.01). After 7 days of reperfusion, the rats in the lidocaine group demonstrated better neurologic outcomes and less weight loss.

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated that a clinical anriarrhythmic dose of lidocaine, when given before and during transient focal cerebral isehemia, significantly reduced infaret size, improved neurologic outcome, and inhibited postisehemic weight loss.

CEREBRAL ischemia is a frequent consequence during cardiac and neurologic surgery. Many surgical procedures such as coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, aneurysmectomy, and resection of arteriovenous malformations, are associated with a substantial risk of focal cerebral ischemia.

Prophylactic pharmacologic neuroprotective interventions could be of great benefit in patients undergoing these procedures. However, there are currently no safe and efficacious agents available to protect the brain from ischemia. Although some agents, such as anesthetics, competitive and noncompetitive N -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, and glycine site antagonists, have been shown to protect against ischemic brain injury in vivo , 1,2they are effective only at the high concentrations. The neurotoxic and systemic side effects of these agents at high concentrations have limited their use as intraoperative neuroprotective agents.

Previous studies in our laboratory found that a low concentration of lidocaine (10 μm) could reduce anoxic damage in vitro  without affecting electrophysiologic activity. 3This concentration of lidocaine has little systemic toxicity and is used widely as an antiarrhythmic agent. Therefore, we conducted the present study to examine the effect of low-dose lidocaine on infarct size in rats when administered before transient focal cerebral ischemia.

Animals and Surgical Preparation

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the State University of New York–Health Science Center at Brooklyn. Male Wistar rats (weight, 280–340 g) were used in the experiments. Animals were allowed free access to food and water before surgery. Rats were placed in a plexiglas box and anesthetized by inhalation of a gas mixture of isoflurane (3%), oxygen (40%), and nitrogen (remainder). After tracheal intubation was completed, the lungs were mechanically ventilated. The isoflurane concentration was reduced to between 2 and 2.2%. The end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, the inspiratory oxygen concentration, and the inspiratory isoflurane concentration were monitored continuously using an airway gas monitor (DATEX Intrumentarium Co., Helsinki, Finland). Ventilation was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Temperature probes were inserted into each animal’s rectum and left-side temporalis muscle. Rectal and pericranial temperatures were kept constant at 38.0°C ± 0.2°C by surface heating or cooling using a temperature-controlled heating pad (Harvard Apparatus Ltd., Edenbridge, Kent, UK) and a temperature controller (Physitemp, Clifton, NJ) throughout the surgical procedure. The tail artery was catheterized for continuous blood pressure monitoring and periodic blood sampling for arterial gas level, pH, and blood glucose level (10 min before ischemia, at 45 min of ischemia, and 60 min after reperfusion). Mean arterial blood pressure was recorded continuously with a Macintosh type of computer (Power Computing Corp., Round Rock, TX) using a MacLab/4e analog-to-digital converter (AD Instruments Pty Ltd., Castle Hill, Australia). The right-side femoral vein was cannulated for drug administration. Then animals were prepared for middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion according to the method of Koizumi et al.  4An incision was made in the midline of the neck, and the right-side carotid bifurcation was exposed. The right-side external carotid artery (ECA) and the internal carotid artery (ICA) were dissected.

After completion of the surgical preparation, the isoflurane concentration was reduced to 1.7%. The animals were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups: the vehicle 2-day group (n = 12), the lidocaine 2-day group (n = 10), the vehicle 7-day group (n = 14), or the lidocaine 7-day group (n = 13). In the lidocaine 2-day and 7-day groups, a 1.5-mg/kg (1 mg/ml in saline) bolus dose of lidocaine was administered intravenously over a period of 2 min. Thereafter, a continuous infusion of lidocaine was initiated at a rate of 2 mg · kg1· h1and continued until 60 min after reperfusion. This is a standard antiarrhythmic dose and is expected to produce a plasma concentration of 2–5 μg/ml during the period of infusion. 5Actual plasma lidocaine concentrations were measured in rats not subjected to ischemia (described later in this section). In the vehicle 2-day and 7-day groups, the animals were given the same volume of saline.

Transient Focal Ischemia

After 30 min of lidocaine or saline administration, the right-side common carotid artery and the ECA were ligated and the blood flow of the ICA was transiently interrupted. An arterial incision was made on the carotid bifurcation near the ICA. A 19-mm length of silicone-coated 4-0 nylon suture was inserted into the lumen of the ICA until it blocked the origin of the MCA. After 90 min of ischemia, reperfusion was accomplished by withdrawal of the suture. The neck incision was closed with sutures. After 180 min of reperfusion, temperature probes and catheters were removed. The trachea was extubated and the animal was allowed to survive for either 2 or 7 days. The animal’s body weight was measured before the experiment and at 24 and 48 h and 7 days after reperfusion.

Neurologic Evaluation

A neurologic examination, as described by Longa et al. , 6was performed 30 min after recovery from anesthesia and at 48 h and 7 days after reperfusion. A standard scoring scale was used: 0, normal; 1, fails to extend the left forepaw; 2, circles to the left; 3, falls to the left; and 4, does not walk spontaneously and exhibits a consciousness disturbance. Neurologic tests were performed by an observer who was blinded to the experimental groups. Rats that exhibited convulsion, sustained consciousness disturbance, or were without neurologic deficit 30 min after recovery from anesthesia were excluded from the study.

Measurement of Infarct Size

In the vehicle and lidocaine 2-day groups, the animals were anesthetized and decapitated 48 h after reperfusion. The brains were removed rapidly and kept in saline solution (0–4°C) for 2 minutes. Each brain was cut into seven 2-mm-thick coronal slices using a rat brain matrix. Slices were immediately incubated at 37°C for 30 min in 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC), 2%. The stained slices were fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution for 2 h. Video images of slices were captured with a charge-coupled device camera (Pixera Corp., Los Gatos, CA), and the areas traced using an image analysis system (NIH Image 1.60; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Infarct volumes in cubic millimeters were calculated using the slice thickness and the measured areas of lesion. To correct for the effect of brain edema, infarct volumes were adjusted by the ratio of the volumes of both cerebral hemispheres (left over right). The extent of infarction was also expressed as the percentage of lesion to the contralateral hemisphere.

In the vehicle and lidocaine 7-day groups, the brains were removed 7 days after reperfusion. Unlike at 48 h after reperfusion, TTC staining could not adequately differentiate the infarcted area from the area that was not infarcted, 7 days after reperfusion. Therefore, we used the hematoxylin and eosin staining method to detect infarct size. Each brain was cut into seven 2-mm-thick coronal blocks. The blocks were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution and embedded in molds with embedding compound (Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Torrance, CA) and dry ice. Coronal sections (20 μm) approximately 1 mm from the anterior surface of each block were cut on a cryostat. The sections were dried and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Video images of individual sections were obtained with a CCD camera, equipped with a macro lens. Brain areas were traced and measured with an image analysis system (NIH Image 1.60). The volume of infarction was calculated as the integrated product of the cross-sectioned area for all sections and the distance between sections. To avoid errors associated with processing of the tissue for histologic analysis, the infarct size was also expressed as the percentage of lesion to the contralateral hemisphere.

Measurement of Lidocaine Concentration

An additional five rats were used to measure plasma lidocaine concentrations. These rats were prepared as described earlier in this section, except that the MCA was not occluded. The dosage regimen of the lidocaine administration was the same as for the lidocaine groups. Blood was obtained during the lidocaine infusion 75 min after the initial bolus of lidocaine. This time point was equivalent to 45 min after the onset of ischemia. Lidocaine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet spectrometer using a ESA Model 580 pump (ESA, Inc., Chelmsford, MA) and UVIS-205 absorbance detector (Linear Instruments Corp., Reno, NV). Plasma samples were extracted with diethyl ether and sulfuric acid according to the method of Klein et al . 7Chloroprocaine was used as an internal standard. The analytic con-ditions were as follows: the column, Inertsil ODS-3 (4.6 × 250 mm; Restek Corp., Bellefonte, PA); the mobile phase, 0.05 m KH2PO4(pH 5.2)–acetonitrile (80/20, vol/vol); and the flow rate, 1 ml/min.

Statistical Analysis

All values, except for neurologic score, are presented as mean ± SD. Infarct size, body weight, and physiological variables were analyzed with the unpaired t  test. Neurologic scores are reported as the median (quartile deviation). Neurologic scores were compared by the use of the two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

One animal from the vehicle 2-day group, two from the lidocaine 2-day group, two from the vehicle 7-day group, and one from the lidocaine 7-day group were excluded from the study because of subarachnoid hemorrhage. One animal from the vehicle 2-day group and one from the lidocaine 7-day group were discarded from the study because of unsuccessful MCA occlusion resulting in no neurologic disturbance 30 min after recovery from anesthesia. Three additional animals in the vehicle 7-day group died on the fifth and sixth days after reperfusion and were discarded from the study, although they did not die of subarachnoid hemorrhage. This may have underestimated the efficacy of lidocaine as a neuroprotective agent.

Physiologic variables in the four experimental groups are given in table 1. Mean arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen tension (Pao2), arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco2), arterial pH, and blood glucose level did not differ significantly between vehicle and lidocaine groups. During the period of ischemia there was a slight increase in mean arterial blood pressure in all groups. Moderate hyperglycemia was also noted in all groups, but there was no difference between vehicle and lidocaine groups. The plasma lidocaine concentration 75 min after the initial bolus administration of lidocaine with our dosage regimen was 1.2 ± 0.4 μg/ml (n = 5).

Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Four Experimental Groups

Data are mean ± SD. Before ischemia, values were measured 10 min before ischemia. During ischemia, values were measured 45 min after the onset of ischemia. After reperfusion, values were measured 60 min after the onset of reperfusion.

2-day = 2 days, 7-day = 7 days of reperfusion after middle cerebral artery occlusion; MABP = mean arterial blood pressure; Pao2= arterial oxygen tension; Paco2= arterial carbon dioxide tension.

Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Four Experimental Groups
Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Four Experimental Groups

All animals in the study lost weight at 24 and 48 h of reperfusion when compared with values before MCA occlusion (fig. 1). The weight differences at 24 and 48 h between the animals in the vehicle groups and the lidocaine groups were not statistically different. However, animals from the vehicle 7-day group continued to lose weight. At 7 days after reperfusion, the lidocaine 7-day group of rats exhibited significantly greater weight than the vehicle 7-day group of rats (P < 0.01).

Fig. 1. Changes in weight after middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion in the 2-day (A ) and the 7-day (B ) groups. *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle 7-day group.

Fig. 1. Changes in weight after middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion in the 2-day (A ) and the 7-day (B ) groups. *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle 7-day group.

Close modal

The neurologic scores 30 min after recovery from anesthesia were not significantly different between vehicle and lidocaine groups (vehicle 2-day, 2 [range, 2–2.5]vs.  lidocaine 2-day, 2 [range, 2–2.5], P = not significant [NS]; vehicle 7-day, 2 [range, 2–2]vs.  lidocaine 7-day, 2 [range, 2–2], P = NS). At 2 days after reperfusion, neurologic scores were slightly better in the lidocaine group compared with the vehicle group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.17;fig. 2A). At 7 days after reperfusion, the neurologic scores were significantly better in the lidocaine 7-day group than in the vehicle 7-day group (P < 0.05;fig. 2B).

Fig. 2. Neurologic scores at 2 days (A ) and 7 days (B ) after reperfusion. The following standard scoring scale was used: 0, normal; 1, fails to extend the left forepaw; 2, circles to the left; 3, falls to the left; and 4, does not walk spontaneously and exhibits a consciousness disturbance. Each point depicts the value for a single rat. Horizontal bars depict median values for each group. *P < 0.05 versus  the vehicle 7-day group.

Fig. 2. Neurologic scores at 2 days (A ) and 7 days (B ) after reperfusion. The following standard scoring scale was used: 0, normal; 1, fails to extend the left forepaw; 2, circles to the left; 3, falls to the left; and 4, does not walk spontaneously and exhibits a consciousness disturbance. Each point depicts the value for a single rat. Horizontal bars depict median values for each group. *P < 0.05 versus  the vehicle 7-day group.

Close modal

The infarct size was significantly smaller in the lidocaine 2-day group (185.0 ± 43.7 mm3) than in the vehicle 2-day group (261.3 ± 45.8 mm3;P < 0.01;fig. 3). The reduction in the size of the infarct in the lidocaine 7-day group (130.4 ± 62.9 mm3) was also statistically significant compared with the vehicle 7-day group (216.6 ± 73.6 mm3;P < 0.01;fig. 4).

Fig. 3. Infarct size 2 days after reperfusion. (A ) Infarct volume (cubic millimeters, mean ± SD). (B ) Percentage of the contralateral hemisphere (mean ± SD). Infarct volumes were measured from 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)–stained sections and corrected for the effect of brain edema (see Materials and Methods). *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle group.

Fig. 3. Infarct size 2 days after reperfusion. (A ) Infarct volume (cubic millimeters, mean ± SD). (B ) Percentage of the contralateral hemisphere (mean ± SD). Infarct volumes were measured from 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)–stained sections and corrected for the effect of brain edema (see Materials and Methods). *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle group.

Close modal

Fig. 4. Infarct size 7 days after reperfusion. (A ) Infarct volume (cubic millimeters, mean ± SD). (B ) Percentage of the contralateral hemisphere (mean ± SD). Infarct volumes were measured from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained sections. *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle group.

Fig. 4. Infarct size 7 days after reperfusion. (A ) Infarct volume (cubic millimeters, mean ± SD). (B ) Percentage of the contralateral hemisphere (mean ± SD). Infarct volumes were measured from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained sections. *P < 0.01 compared with the vehicle group.

Close modal

Our study demonstrates that intravenous administration of low-dose lidocaine (a clinical antiarrhythmic dose) significantly reduces infarct size in a rat model of transient focal cerebral ischemia when administration begins 30 min before MCA occlusion. Pretreatment with lidocaine also improves neurologic outcome and postischemic body weight loss.

Lidocaine, which is commonly used as a local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic agent, has also been investigated as a potential neuroprotective agent. 8–16However, the use of lidocaine for cerebral protection during ischemia has produced conflicting results. The inconsistent results might well reflect a divergence in animal models, lidocaine dosage regimen, or techniques for evaluating the effect of lidocaine. When high-dose lidocaine (resulting in burst suppression and isoelectric electroencephalogram) and severe cerebral ischemia models were used, several studies failed to show the protective effect of lidocaine. 9,12In contrast, a lower dose of lidocaine has been shown to have protective effect after mild cerebral ischemia. 11,14Indeed, at high concentrations lidocaine is neurotoxic. 17,18Low concentrations of lidocaine have significant effects on other excitable tissue. 5Thus, the effect of lidocaine on neurons may depend on its concentration; the concentration necessary to produce neuroprotective effects may be within the range of lower concentrations. Recently, Mitchell et al.  19reported that prophylactic infusion of an antiarrhythmic dose of lidocaine could improve neurologic outcome after cardiac operations, suggesting that this dose of lidocaine is neuroprotective.

Neuroprotective mechanisms of lidocaine have been postulated to include one or more of the following pharmacologic effects of this drug: (1) deceleration of ischemic transmembrane ion shifts and inhibition of anoxic depolarization, 3,20(2) reduction in cerebral metabolic rate, 21(3) reduction in the release of excitatory amino acids, 22–24(4) modulation of leukocyte activity, 25(5) increase in cerebral blood flow, 15,16(6) scavenging of oxygen free radicals, 26or (7) reduction in the intracranial pressure. 27However, the exact mechanism for the neuroprotective effect of lidocaine, especially low-dose lidocaine, is not known. In a previous study from our laboratory, a low concentration of lidocaine (10 μm) significantly improved recovery of the evoked population spike recorded from the CA1 pyramidal cell layer after anoxia. 3This concentration of lidocaine had no significant effect on potassium levels or calcium influx during anoxia but reduced cellular sodium levels and preserved adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels during anoxia. The protective action of low-dose lidocaine observed in the current study may be related to deceleration of ischemic transmembrane ion shifts and reduction in neuronal ATP consumption.

Because most episodes of cerebral ischemia during surgical procedures are focal in nature, we chose a rat model of transient focal cerebral ischemia. It has become increasingly clear that focal cerebral ischemia produces a densely ischemic core and a perifocal area with a moderate reduction of blood flow. 28–30The latter, often referred to as the ischemic penumbra, has received a great deal of attention because the neuronal injury in this area is essentially reversible and may be salvageable by pharmacologic agents. 30It has been reported that the volume of the ischemic penumbra is greater than the volume of the densely ischemic core soon after the onset of focal ischemia. 31However, the ischemic penumbra disappears because of progressive metabolic deterioration in the first hours following MCA occlusion and becomes a part of the irreversibly damaged infarct core. Periinfarct depolarizations have been suggested to play an important role in the progression of the ischemic penumbra into the infarct core. 28Glutamate efflux or the release of K+from the deteriorating ischemic core produce repetitive waves of anoxic depolarization in cells in the ischemic penumbra. 28,30Repetitive depolarizations are harmful to the energetically stressed cells in the penumbra. Inhibition of periinfarct depolarizations has been shown to reduce the infarct size. 32–35It is possible that low-dose lidocaine may increase the tolerance of cells in the ischemic penumbra to repetitive depolarizations by attenuating ATP depletion. 3In addition, lidocaine may also reduce periinfarct depolarizations by blocking Na influx 3or inhibiting the release of glutamate 22–24; this may limit the expansion of the infarction.

Shokunbi et al . 15found that a continuous infusion of lidocaine preserved the blood flow in the ischemic zone in a feline model of transient focal cerebral ischemia. Muir and Ellis 36also found that lidocaine infusion improved posttraumatic blood flow. Although the doses of lidocaine used in those studies are different from that of the present study, it is possible that the neuroprotective effect observed in the present study may be a result of an intraischemic blood flow improvement in the infarct and periinfarct areas. Because the cerebral blood flow was not measured in the present study, we do not know whether the neuroprotective effect of lidocaine is at a cellular level or by preserving the cerebral blood flow. It is necessary to clarify the effect of low-dose lidocaine on cerebral blood flow in this rat model of transient focal cerebral ischemia.

Isoflurane was used in this study. Isoflurane has been shown to have neuroprotective effects in a model of focal cerebral ischemia in the rat similar to that used in the present study. 37It has been reported that isoflurane can inhibit the release of glutamate, 38reduce the frequency of NMDA receptor channel opening, the mean open time of the channel in response to stimulation of NMDA 39and NMDA toxicity. 40In addition, isoflurane may reduce the degree of ischemia, particularly in the ischemic penumbra, because of the effects of its metabolic suppression. 41Although both control and experimental groups were subjected to the same concentration of isoflurane, it is possible that lidocaine may exert synergistic effects.

The neurologic scores at 30 min after recovery from anesthesia were similar in the vehicle and the lidocaine groups. The neurologic outcome improved in both the vehicle and the lidocaine groups over time. However, there was a better neurologic outcome in the lidocaine group after 7 days of reperfusion. It has been proposed that, initially, the neurologic deficits reflect injury to the core as well as the penumbra. 30Thus, neurologic deficits do not necessarily reflect a structural lesion. The similar neurologic deficits at the early stage of reperfusion do not indicate that the size of the densely ischemic core was the same in vehicle and lidocaine groups. Because the size of the infarct in the densely ischemic core is not modified by pharmacologic interventions, we postulate that there may be a greater ischemic penumbra area and a smaller densely ischemic core in the lidocaine groups than in the vehicle groups or that a larger part of the ischemic penumbra in the lidocaine groups may be salvaged and not progress into infarction.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that intravenous administration of a clinical antiarrhythmic dose of lidocaine starting 30 min before transient focal cerebral ischemia significantly reduces infarct size, improves neurologic outcome, and inhibits postischemic weight loss.

The authors thank Christine M. Capuano-Waters, B.S., Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, New York, for technical assistance.

1.
Kirsch JR, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD: Anesthetics and cerebroprotection: Experimental aspects. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1996; 34: 73–93
2.
Cottrell JE: Possible mechanisms of pharmacological neuronal protection. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1995; 7: 31–7
3.
Fried E, Amorim P, Chambers G, Cottrell JE, Kass IS: The importance of sodium for anoxic transmission damage in rat hippocampal slices: Mechanisms of protection by lidocaine. J Physiol (Lond) 1995; 489: 557–65
4.
Koizumi J, Yoshida Y, Nakazawa T, Ooneda G: Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema: I. A new experimental model of cerebral embolism in rats in which recirculation can be introduced in the ischemic area. Jpn J Stroke 1986; 8: 1–8
5.
Somberg JC: The clinical pharmacology of antiarrhythmic agents, Control of Cardiac Rhythm. Edited by Vaugham Williams EM, Somberg JC. Philadelphia, Lippincott–Raven, 1998, pp 115–53
6.
Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R: Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 1989; 20: 84–91
7.
Klein J, Fernandes D, Gazarian M, Kent G, Koren G: Simultaneous determination of lidocaine, prilocaine and the prilocaine metabolite o -toluidine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 1994; 655: 83–8
8.
Evans DE, Kobrine AI, LeGrys DC, Bradley ME: Protective effect of lidocaine in acute cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism. J Neurosurg 1984; 60: 257–63
9.
Shokunbi MT, Gelb AW, Peerless SJ, Mervart M, Floyd P: An evaluation of the effect of lidocaine in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1986; 17: 962–6
10.
Gelb AW, Steinberg GK, Lam AM, Manninen PH, Peerless SJ, Rassi-Neto A: The effects of a prophylactic bolus of lidocaine in focal cerebral ischemia. Can J Anesth 1988; 35: 489–93
11.
Nagao S, Murota T, Momma F, Kuyama H, Nishimoto A: The effect of intravenous lidocaine on experimental brain edema and neural activities. J Trauma 1988; 28: 1650–5
12.
Warner DS, Godersky JC, Maj-Lis S: Failure of preischemic lidocaine administration to ameliorate brain damage in the rat. A nesthesiology 1988; 68: 73–8
13.
Sutherland G, Ong BY, Louw D, Sima AAF: Effect of lidocaine on forebrain ischemia in rats. Stroke 1989; 20: 119–22
14.
Evans DE, Catron PW, McDermott JJ, Thomas LB, Kobrine AI, Flynn ET: Effect of lidocaine after experimental cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism. J Neurosurg 1989; 70: 97–102
15.
Shokunbi MT, Gelb AW, Wu XM, Miller DJ: Continuous lidocaine infusion and focal feline cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1990; 21: 107–11
16.
Rasool N, Faroqui M, Rubinstein EH: Lidocaine accelerates neuroelectrical recovery after incomplete global ischemia in rabbits. Stroke 1990; 21: 929–35
17.
Gold MS, Reichling DB, Hampl KF, Drasner K, Levine JD: Lidocaine toxicity in primary afferent neurons from the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998; 285: 413–21
18.
Haschke RH, Fink BR: Lidocaine effects on brain mitochondrial metabolism in vitro. A nesthesiology 1975; 42: 737–40
19.
Mitchell SJ, Pellett O, Gorman DF: Cerebral protection by lidocaine during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1117–24
20.
Liu K, Adachi N, Yanase H, Kataoka K, Arai T: Lidocaine suppresses the anoxic depolarization and reduces the increase in the intracellular Ca2+concentration in gerbil hippocampal neurons. A nesthesiology 1997; 87: 1470–8
21.
Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Ishikawa T, Takeshita H: The effects of lidocaine on canine cerebral metabolism and circulation related to the electroencephalogram. A nesthesiology 1974; 40: 433–41
22.
Fujitani T, Adachi N, Miyazaki H, Liu K, Nakamura Y, Kataoka K, Arai T: Lidocaine protects hippocampal neurons against ischemic damage by preventing increase of extracellular excitatory amino acids: a microdialysis study in Mongolian gerbils. Neurosci Lett 1994; 179: 91–4
23.
Diaz L, Gomez A, Bustos G: Lidocaine reduces the hypoxia-induced release of an excitatory amino acid analog from rat striatal slices in superfusion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1995; 19: 943–53
24.
Taylor CP, Burke SP, Weber ML: Hippocampal slices: glutamate overflow and cellular damage from ischemia are reduced by sodium-channel blockade. J Neurosci Methods 1995; 59: 121–8
25.
MacGregor RR, Thorner RE, Wright DM: Lidocaine inhibits granulocyte adherence and prevents granulocyte delivery to inflammatory sites. Blood 1980; 56: 203–9
26.
Das KD, Misra HP: Lidocaine: A hydroxyl radical scavenger and singlet oxygen quencher. Mol Cell Biochem 1992; 115: 179–85
27.
Evans DE, Kobrine AI: Reduction of experimental intracranial hypertension by lidocaine. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 542–7
28.
Lipton P: Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev 1999; 79: 1431–568
29.
Memezawa H, Minamisawa H, Smith M-L, Siesjö BK: Ischemic penumbra in a model of reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Exp Brain Res 1992; 89: 67–78
30.
Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA: Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: An integrated view. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 391–7
31.
Back T, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD: Three-dimensional image analysis of brain glucose metabolism/blood flow uncoupling and its electrophysiological correlates in the acute ischemic penumbra following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1995; 15: 566–77
32.
Chen Q, Chopp M, Bodzin G, Chen H: Temperature modulation of cerebral depolarization during focal cerebral ischemia in rats: Correlation with ischemic injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13: 389–94
33.
Dijkhuizen RM, Beekwilder JP, Van der Worp HB, Van der Sprenkel JWB, Tulleken KAF, Nicolay K: Correlation between tissue depolarizations and damage in focal ischemic rat brain. Brain Res 1999; 840: 194–205
34.
Mies G, Iijima T, Hossmann K-A: Prevention of periinfarct direct current shifts with glutamate antagonist NBQX following occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994; 14: 802–7
35.
Patel PM, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Kelly PJ, Watson M: Isoflurane and pentobarbital reduce the frequency of transient ischemic depolarizations during focal ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 773–80
36.
Muir JK, Ellis EF: Acute cocaine administration alters posttraumatic blood pressure and cerebral blood flow in rats. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: H68–73
37.
Soonthon-Brant V, Patel PM, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Kelly PJ, Watson M: Fentanyl does not increase brain injury after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 49–55
38.
Patel PM, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Goskowicz RL: Isoflurane reduces ischemia-induced glutamate release in rats subjected to forebrain ischemia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 996–1003
39.
Yang J, Zorumski CF: Effects of isoflurane on N -methyl-D-aspartate gated ion channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 625: 287–9
40.
Harada H, Kelly PJ, Cole DJ, Drummond JC, Patel PM: Isoflurane reduces N -methyl-D-aspartate toxicity in vivo in the rat cerebral cortex. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 1442–7
41.
Newberg L, Milde J, Michenfelder J: The cerebral metabolic effects of isoflurane at and above concentrations that suppress cortical electrical activity. A nesthesiology 1983; 59: 23–8