THE considerable interest shown in inhaled nitric oxide (INO) over the last decade, and the number of publications describing the clinical applications of this agent, testify to the perceived clinical need for a drug that acts selectively on the pulmonary vasculature. 1Such an agent should decrease pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), without affecting systemic arterial pressure (SAP), and potentially improve oxygenation by redistributing pulmonary blood flow to ventilated areas of lung. INO (INO Therapeutics Inc., Clinton NJ) possesses these properties and has gained approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the care of neonates with acute lung injury and pulmonary hypertension (PH), and widespread clinical acceptance (but not FDA approval) for adults with PH with or without lung injury. Delivered as a gas, INO is preferentially distributed to the ventilated areas of the lung, where it produces relaxation of pulmonary vascular smooth muscle via activation of guanylate cyclase and the conversion of guanosine-5-triphosphate to cyclic guanosine monophosphate. 1Absorbed INO is rapidly inactivated by hemoglobin, thereby preventing systemic effects and confining its vasodilator properties to the pulmonary circulation. 1
The search for inhaled selective pulmonary vasodilators was an active area of research, particularly in Europe and Australia, before the widespread publicity and testing of INO in the early 1990s. However, research on this subject appears to have declined inversely with the growing acceptance and use of INO. Until FDA approval had been granted, INO had been supplied free of charge in the United States on an investigational-drug basis. However, after FDA approval, the cost of treatment with INO became very expensive. This prompted a search at our institution for alternative agents to INO. The purpose of this article is to review the published experience concerning alternative inhaled vasodilators and, when possible, compare their reported efficacy with that of INO.
Nitric Oxide Donor Drugs
A number of synthetic agents release nitric oxide (NO) either spontaneously or after enzymatic cleavage and thereby provide a means of delivering NO to its site of action in a form other than as a gas. The following sections describe those NO donors that have been examined as possible pulmonary vasodilators.
Nitric Oxide–Nucleophile Adducts
Compounds formed by reacting NO with various nucleophiles release NO spontaneously in physiologic solutions, are stable as solids, are highly soluble in aqueous media, and have the potential to function as an aqueous slow-release form of NO. Jacobs et al. 2demonstrated that an inhaled NONOate [2-(dimethylamino) ethylputreanine–NO] improved oxygenation and reduced PVR, without affecting systemic hemodynamics, in a porcine model of oleic-acid–induced acute lung injury and PH. Similarly, Brilli et al. 3demonstrated that two investigational inhaled NONOates produced selective pulmonary vasodilation lasting 30–50 min in a porcine model of PH. Adrie et al. 4compared the pulmonary effects of the NONOate, sodium 1-(N , N -diethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate, with INO and inhaled sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in an ovine model of PH. Although SNP caused dose-dependent selective pulmonary vasodilation, the NONOate decreased both pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances, implying a nonselective action. The pulmonary vasodilation produced by either inhaled SNP or the NONOate was of longer duration than that produced by INO.
There are currently no clinical investigations describing the use of these novel NO donor drugs. However, animal studies suggest that their properties in terms of pulmonary selectivity and duration of effect may be highly dependent on their specific chemical structure.
Inhaled SNP has been evaluated in animal models of PH. It has been shown to produce dose-dependent pulmonary vasodilation in isolated perfused rabbit lungs with thromboxane-induced PH. 5In an ovine model of PH, inhaled SNP produced selective pulmonary vasodilation at concentrations less than 10−2m but nonselective vasodilation at concentrations greater than 10−2m. 4
Yu and Saugstad 6compared the effects of a 30-min nebulization of either saline or SNP in a lavaged-induced lung injury model in newborn piglets. Inhaled SNP produced a significant decrease in mean PAP (from 32 to 17 mmHg) and PVR, which was sustained for the 30-min treatment period. There was no effect on SAP. The arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) increased from 71 to 130 mmHg and was associated with a significant decrease in arterial carbon dioxide tension. The dose of SNP used in the study was based on the results of pilot studies in which the investigators found that higher doses produced systemic hypotension. Meadow et al. , 7investigated the short-term effects of inhaled SNP (50 mg in 5 ml saline) in a porcine model of PH, induced by either hypoxia or group B streptococci. Inhaled SNP selectively decreased PAP in hypoxia-induced PH, which was sustained with continuous treatment for longer than 60 min. A reduced response was observed in streptococci-induced PH, and there was no associated improvement in oxygenation.
There is one report of the clinical use of inhaled SNP. Ten cyanotic newborns were treated with aerosolized SNP, at a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml in distilled water, for a duration of 97–157 h. 8Nine of the newborns responded with a significant, often dramatic, increase in their ratio of Pao2to fraction of inspired oxygen (Pao2/Fio2) after 1 h of therapy (mean increase from 32 to 94 mmHg). The effect on SAP was variable, decreasing in some patients and increasing in others, but overall producing no significant change.
The animal studies suggest that the dose of inhaled SNP to produce selective pulmonary vasodilation is critical, which would not allow SNP to be an ideal inhaled pulmonary vasodilator. However, the results of the one clinical study were sufficiently impressive to justify further studies with inhaled SNP.
There is little reported on the use of inhaled nitroglycerin. In a canine model of thromboxane-induced PH, Gong et al. , 9demonstrated that aerosolized nitroglycerin caused a 31% decrease in PVR with no effect on SAP. Schutte et al. 5studied several NO donors, including nitroglycerin, in the isolated rabbit lung. Nitroglycerin produced dose-dependent pulmonary vasodilation, which was noted to be significantly less efficacious than the other agents tested, including SNP.
Nitric oxide exerts its biologic properties by increasing intracellular concentrations of cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate is rapidly metabolized by phosphodiesterases, thereby terminating the effect of NO. Ichinose et al. 10,11investigated the pulmonary vascular effect of inhalation of phosphodiesterase inhibitors of the type 5 class (zaprinast, sildenafil), which block the hydrolysis of cyclic guanosine monophosphate with minimal effects on the metabolism of adenosine-3,5-cyclic monophosphate, in an ovine model of PH. They demonstrated that these phosphodiesterase inhibitors not only augmented the effect of combined INO administration but produced selective pulmonary vasodilation when given alone. The selectivity of the pulmonary vasodilation was dose-dependent for zaprinast, with systemic hypotension occurring at the highest doses tested.
Haraldsson et al. 12recently demonstrated that inhaled milrinone, a type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitor that increases vascular smooth muscle adenosine-3,5-cyclic monophosphate concentrations, caused selective pulmonary vasodilation in cardiac surgical patients with postoperative PH.
Prostaglandin E1(Alprostadil, Prostin VR Pediatric)
In contrast to the aforementioned agents that mediate their effects via release of NO and activation of soluble guanylate cyclase, vasodilator prostaglandins bind to cell surface prostaglandin receptors, which are part of the G-protein superfamily, causing activation of adenylate cyclase. 13Prostaglandin E1(PGE1) is normally present within the lung, where it produces smooth muscle relaxation. PGE1is a stable compound at neutral pH but is rapidly degraded in vivo by the enzyme 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase to 15-keto-PGE1, 14which is then further transformed into 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE1. There is some evidence that 15-keto-PGE1, which is inactive, may also be reduced to 13,14-dihydro-PGE1, which possesses vasodilator properties. 15
Intravenous PGE1has an established place for maintaining the patency of the ductus arteriosus in infants with congenital heart disease until a formal shunt procedure can be performed. It has also been used in the treatment of PH in patients with mitral valve disease, 16acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 17and after heart transplantation. 18,19Because the lung removes more than 70% of an intravenously administered dose of PGE1during one passage, 20,21it has been suggested that intravenous PGE1may act as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. However, other investigators have not been able to confirm this pulmonary selectivity. 17
There have been very few studies examining the hemodynamic effects of inhaled PGE1. Animal models of thromboxane-induced PH suggest that inhaled PGE1is a less effective pulmonary vasodilator than either INO or inhaled prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2[PGI2]). 22,23Putensen et al. 24compared the effects of INO and nebulized PGE1in 10 adult patients with ARDS. The dose of both INO and PGE1was individually titrated to obtain the maximum improvement in Pao2. This was achieved with a dose of 2–10 ppm of INO and 6–15 ng · kg−1· min−1of PGE1. INO and PGE1produced comparable decreases in mean PAP and PVR and increases in right ventricle ejection fraction and Pao2. Neither drug had any effect on SAP. To produce a comparable decrease in mean PAP, the investigators had to intravenously administer 8–16 ng · kg−1· min−1of PGE1. This study demonstrated that, for short-term exposure in patients with ARDS, inhaled PGE1produced identical responses to INO at doses comparable to those used intravenously. As well as inducing relaxation of vascular smooth muscle, inhaled PGE1also produces bronchodilation. 25
Prostaglandin E1is readily available in many hospitals caring for neonates and, based on the preliminary data, deserves further examination, particularly comparing its clinical efficacy with INO and inhaled PGI2.
Iloprost is the stable carbacyclin derivative of PGI2. Studies examining the actions of inhaled iloprost have shown that it has comparable pulmonary hemodynamic effects to INO and PGI2. 26,27Its advantages over PGI2include its solubility in saline, obviating the need for an alkaline buffer, a lower viscosity, which aids nebulization, and a significantly longer duration of action, permitting effective intermittent rather than continuous nebulizations. The plasma half-life of iloprost is 20–30 min, 28and the hemodynamic effects of a single inhaled dose lasts approximately 1 h. 27Hoeper et al. 27compared the short-term effects of INO (40 ppm) versus a single treatment of inhaled iloprost (14–17 μg) in 35 patients with primary PH. The effects of iloprost on PVR were evident within 2–5 min, caused a maximum decrease of 30% from the baseline PVR, and dissipated by 75 min. Iloprost produced a greater decrease in PVR and increase in cardiac output than INO.
In one of the first descriptions of the long-term use of inhaled iloprost, Olschewski et al. 29described the use of repeated daily nebulizations of iloprost (150 μg/day) in the management of a patient with severe primary PH and right heart failure. Iloprost decreased PAP and PVR, increased cardiac output, and improved gas exchange. The beneficial responses were sustained during long-term inhalational therapy. Furthermore, no evidence of tolerance with long-term therapy or rebound PH between doses was detected. Studies examining larger series of patients with primary PH have confirmed that inhaled iloprost produces a sustained long-term (up to 12 months) improvement in exercise capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics. 30–32Inhaled therapy overcomes one of the major disadvantages of continuous intravenous therapy, namely, the need for a permanent central venous catheter. There is one report of patients with severe PH developing right ventricular (RV) failure when the investigators attempted to substitute intermittent inhaled iloprost for continuous therapy with intravenous PGI2. 33Conversely, Olschewski et al. 32were unable to substitute intravenous PGI2for inhaled iloprost in three of their patients because of worsening arterial hypotension.
Inhaled iloprost appears to have comparable hemodynamic effects to INO and has been administered for both short- and long-term use with just the one report of adverse effects. Unfortunately, iloprost is not available in the United States.
Prostaglandin I2(Epoprostenol, Prostacyclin, Flolan, Prostaglandin I2)
Prostacyclin (PGI2) is a member of the prostaglandin family of lipid mediators derived from arachadonic acid and is synthesized predominantly by endothelial cells, including the pulmonary vascular endothelium. 34PGI2is a vasodilator and is the most potent known inhibitor of platelet aggregation. These properties suggest that it has a role in preventing clot formation in uninjured vessels and producing vasodilation in low resistance vascular beds such as the pulmonary circulation. 35PGI2has also been shown to stimulate endothelial release of NO, 36and, in turn, NO has been shown to enhance the production of PGI2in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. 37
Prostaglandin I2is spontaneously hydrolyzed at neutral pH in plasma to its inactive metabolite, 6-keto-prostaglandin-F1α. The in vitro half-life of prostacyclin in human blood at 37°C and pH of 7.4 is approximately 6 min. 38Animal studies demonstrate that intravenous PGI2has a high clearance (93 ml · min−1· kg−1), small volume of distribution (357 ml/kg), and a short half-life (2.7 min). 35
Most of our knowledge concerning the pharmacologic effects of PGI2is derived from the clinical experience using intravenous PGI2. Intravenous PGI2has been used in the management of primary PH for nearly 20 yr. Other indications have included ARDS, 39peripheral vascular disease, and congestive cardiac failure. The reported adverse reactions to intravenous PGI2include flushing, headache, jaw pain, nausea and vomiting, anxiety, chest pain, flu-like symptoms, dizziness, abdominal pain, bradycardia, and tachycardia. In contrast to INO, 40PGI2has no known toxic effects or metabolites.
Inhaled PGI2is not metabolized within the lung to any significant extent. Systemic absorption of PGI2can be determined by measuring the serum concentration of its major metabolite, 6-keto-PGF1α. Concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1αwere undetectable after 8 h of inhaled PGI2in healthy lambs 41; however, increased serum concentrations have been noted in patients with ARDS. 42
Prostacyclin is supplied as a powder that must be dissolved in the glycine buffer supplied by the manufacturer before use. After reconstitution, PGI2has satisfactory stability for up to 12 h at room temperature and for 48 h if refrigerated. The solution must be protected from light after reconstitution to avoid photodegradation.
The administration of inhaled PGI2to humans was first reported in 1978. 43A number of trials have since been published examining its effects in animal models and a number of clinical settings. The studies described have a number of limitations. These include the small number of enrolled patients and the fact that most examine only the short-term response to inhaled PGI2rather than the response to sustained treatment. The latter is a more relevant model of the clinical situation where prolonged (hours to days) selective pulmonary vasodilation is required.
Inhaled PGI2and INO have been compared in a number of animal models of PH. In canine, 44,45porcine, 46and ovine 47models of hypoxia-induced PH, both agents selectively decreased PAP without affecting SAP, with INO appearing to possess greater efficacy at the doses tested. In a porcine model of acute lung injury and PH, induced by repeated lung lavage and a continuous infusion of a thromboxane analog, 48INO and inhaled PGI2were equally effective at selectively decreasing PAP, whereas INO was more effective at decreasing intrapulmonary shunt and improving Pao2. A similar finding was observed by Walmrath et al. 49in a rabbit model of PH. The majority of these studies suggest that INO is the more efficacious of the two agents; however, with one exception, 49fixed doses were compared rather than titrating either agent to maximum effect.
Inhaled NO and PGI2exert their effects by different cellular mechanisms: NO via activation of guanylate cyclase producing cyclic guanosine monophosphate, and PGI2via adenylate cyclase producing adenosine-3,5-cyclic monophosphate. The net effect of activation of either of these pathways is relaxation of vascular smooth muscle, raising the possibility of an additive effect if the two agents were combined. This has been confirmed in a rodent model of chronic PH. 50Furthermore, the pulmonary vasodilatory response to inhaled PGI2can be enhanced by concomitant therapy with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, thereby further increasing cellular concentrations of adenosine-3,5-cyclic monophosphate. 51All of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors studied amplified the response to inhaled PGI2; however, the combined type 3 and 4 inhibitors proved the most potent, prolonging the posttreatment response duration of a single treatment of inhaled PGI2from less than 10 to more than 30 min. 51
Human Studies of Pulmonary Hypertension
Although intravenous PGI2has an established role in the long-term management of primary PH, 52a number of studies have examined the response to inhaled therapy. Mikhail et al. , 53compared increasing doses of inhaled PGI2(15–50 ng · kg−1· min−1) to INO (10–100 ppm) in 12 patients with PH (7 with primary PH and 5 with PH secondary to such causes as thromboembolism and ischemic cardiomyopathy). Both agents produced selective pulmonary vasodilation, with inhaled PGI2producing the greater decrease in mean PVR (38 vs. 12%). There was no detectable dose–response during the 15–50-ng · kg−1· min−1dose range, suggesting that a maximum response had been attained at the lowest dose tested. Olschewski et al. 26compared INO, inhaled PGI2, and inhaled iloprost in four patients with primary PH and two patients with severe PH secondary to connective tissue disease. All drugs produced comparable selective pulmonary vasodilation and improved Pao2. Webb et al. 54described the emergency use of inhaled PGI2in the management of a cyanotic, hypotensive patient with severe PH caused by an acute on chronic pulmonary thromboembolism. A dose of 200 ng · kg−1· min−1decreased the mean PAP from 59 to 53 mmHg with no effect on SAP, and increased the Pao2/Fio2ratio from 66 to 225 mmHg.
Haraldsson et al. 55compared the short-term response to INO (40 ppm) and inhaled PGI2(20–30-μg bolus dose) in 10 patients with PH (PVR > 200 dyne · s−1· cm−5) awaiting heart transplantation. Both INO and inhaled PGI2selectively decreased mean PAP (−7%vs. −7%) and PVR (−43%vs. −49%) to a similar degree. An 11% increase in cardiac output was observed with inhaled PGI2but not INO. Both drugs increased pulmonary artery occlusion pressures, which was associated in some cases with the development of overt pulmonary edema. The proposed mechanism for this finding is that pulmonary vasodilation produces increased RV ejection and pulmonary blood flow, increasing blood return to a left ventricle that cannot increase its stroke volume to compensate for the increased preload. 56This phenomena has previously been described for INO 57,58and cautions against the use of selective pulmonary vasodilators in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Eichelbronner et al. 59investigated the effects of inhaled PGI2and INO in 16 patients with septic shock (requiring pressors to maintain mean arterial pressures) and PH. Both agents were equally effective in reducing PAP and improving Pao2without affecting systemic hemodynamics. Interestingly, therapy with inhaled PGI2, but not INO, was associated with an improvement in splanchnic perfusion and oxygenation.
Inhaled NO has proved to be a valuable agent in the treatment of patients with PH and acute RV failure after cardiac surgery. 1,56The selective pulmonary vasodilation reduces RV afterload, thereby improving RV ejection fraction and cardiac output, without decreasing SAP and jeopardizing blood flow to major organs. There are as yet only limited studies of the effects of inhaled PGI2for this indication. Haraldsson et al. 62examined the short-term effects of inhaled PGI2at three different doses (2.5, 5.0, and 10 μg) in nine postoperative patients with PH, two after heart transplantation and seven after coronary artery bypass grafting. A significant decrease in mean PAP and PVR was observed in response to the 5- and 10-μg doses, with no decrease in SAP. Schroeder et al. 63recently reported on the intraoperative use of inhaled PGI2in four cardiac surgical patients with increased PAP and impaired RV function. A dose of 36 ng · kg−1· min−1decreased PVR by 35% with no effect on SAP, improved RV function, and increased cardiac index by 26%.
Inhaled PGI2has also been administered to patients after lung transplantation. In one study, 10 ng · kg−1· min−1of inhaled PGI2produced an 11% decrease in mean PAP and a 25% decrease in intrapulmonary shunt. 64The same investigators also demonstrated that combined therapy with inhaled PGI2and INO after lung transplantation produced a greater decrease in PAP and intrapulmonary shunt than INO alone, 65thereby validating the animal studies. 50
Impaired platelet function is a potential undesirable effect of PGI2therapy in patients after cardiac surgery. Haraldsson et al. 66studied platelet aggregation and thromboelastographic responses in patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery receiving an aerosol of saline or 30 or 62 ng · kg−1· min−1of inhaled PGI2for 6 h postoperatively. Impaired in vitro platelet aggregation, beyond that expected after cardiopulmonary bypass, was noted after 2 h of PGI2therapy, with a suggestion of further impairment at 6 h, the maximum duration of therapy. Despite in vitro evidence of platelet dysfunction, there was no difference between groups with respect to bleeding time, chest tube drainage, or transfusion requirements. Interestingly, there was no difference in 6-keto-PGF1αconcentrations between the control and the two PGI2groups after 6 h of therapy, suggesting minimal absorption of PGI2from the lungs into the systemic circulation.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
A number of studies have shown that the use of intravenous PGI2in ARDS is limited by its propensity to cause systemic hypotension and increase pulmonary venous admixture. 39,67In contrast, inhaled PGI2has been found to produce selective pulmonary vasodilation comparable to that caused by INO. 68In 1993, Walmrath et al. 68administered inhaled PGI2(17–50 ng · kg−1· min−1) to three patients with ARDS. Mean PAP decreased in all patients (from 40 to 32 mmHg) associated with an increase in the Pao2/Fio2ratio from 120 to 173 mmHg. Van Heerden et al. 42studied the response to 10–50 ng · kg−1· min−1of inhaled PGI2in nine patients with ARDS. Oxygenation improved in response to 10 ng · kg−1· min−1, with no further significant improvement at higher doses. Although there was no apparent effect on PAP, none of the patients studied had significant PH (see Human Studies of Pulmonary Hypertension). There was also no demonstrable effect on in vitro platelet aggregation studies. In one of the larger reported studies, Walmrath et al. 69compared the effects of the lowest dose of either INO or inhaled PGI2that produced the maximum increase in Pao2in 16 patients with ARDS. The dose of INO that produced the maximum increase in Pao2ranged from 2 to 40 ppm, whereas the comparable dose range for inhaled PGI2was 1.5–34 ng · kg−1· min−1(mean, 7.5 ng · kg−1· min−1). Both agents produced a 7% decrease in measured intrapulmonary shunt and a comparable increase in the Pao2, whereas inhaled PGI2produced a greater decrease in PVR than INO. Neither drug decreased SAP. Some patients were given either drug for 48 h or longer, demonstrating that the beneficial effects of inhaled PGI2on Pao2and selective pulmonary vasodilation were sustained. Zwissler et al. 70compared three doses of INO (1, 4, and 8 ppm) and inhaled PGI2(1, 10, and 25 ng · kg−1· min−1) in eight patients with ARDS (Pao2/Fio2ratio < 155 mmHg). PVR was decreased by 10 and 25 ng · kg−1· min−1of inhaled PGI2but not by INO. Oxygenation improved with the 10- and 25-ng · kg−1· min−1doses of inhaled PGI2and all doses of INO, with 8 ppm of INO producing a greater increase in Pao2(+ 45%) than 25 ng · kg−1· min−1of PGI2(+ 25%) (fig. 1).
One study suggested that the response to inhaled PGI2in patients with ARDS may differ according to the cause of the lung injury. 71Overall, 53% of patients responded to inhaled PGI2(≥ 10% increase in Pao2/Fio2ratio) which is comparable to the percentage of patients with ARDS that respond to INO. 72However, the majority of the responders to inhaled PGI2consisted of patients whose ARDS was caused by extrapulmonary disease (sepsis, major trauma). Few patients whose ARDS was caused by primary pulmonary injury (pneumonia, aspiration) responded. A significant decrease in PAP in response to inhaled PGI2was also only observed in the former patient group. In contrast, Walmrath et al. , 73demonstrated that patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia had a good response to inhaled PGI2provided that preexisting interstitial lung disease was absent.
From the few clinical studies to date, inhaled PGI2may be more effective at treating PH and less effective at improving Pao2as compared with INO. Despite decreasing PVR and improving oxygenation in approximately 60% of patients with ARDS, INO therapy has not been shown to improve outcome. 72,74Whether inhaled PGI2is capable of altering outcome of ARDS is not known. Furthermore, the results obtained for one pulmonary vasodilator may not be applicable to all such agents, particularly those acting via different cellular mechanisms.
Inhaled NO is approved by the FDA for the treatment of term and near-term (> 34 weeks) neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure associated with PH. There have been very few studies examining inhaled PGI2in this patient population. Bindl et al. , 75reported the effects of inhaled PGI2in two neonates with PH. Inhaled PGI2(20–28 ng · kg−1· min−1) produced a significant decrease in the alveolar–arterial oxygen difference, associated with a modest decrease in PAP but no decrease in SAP. Pappert et al. 76compared the effects of INO (range, 0.1–10 ppm) and inhaled PGI2(range, 2–20 ng · kg−1· min−1) in three children with ARDS. Both agents produced a decrease in intrapulmonary shunt and PAP in response to at least one of the doses tested.
Zwissler et al. 77described a 4-kg infant with total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage who developed severe postoperative PH and acute RV failure, despite the administration of enoximone and intravenous PGI2. Inhaled PGI2(50 ng · kg−1· min−1) decreased the systolic PAP from 60 to 50 mmHg, which was associated with an increase in SAP. This was administered for a total of 13 h. Attempts to terminate treatment were associated with a rapid increase in PAP and decrease in Pao2(from 259 to 65 mmHg).
De Jaegere et al. 78studied the effects of a 50-ng/kg bolus dose of inhaled PGI2to four hypoxic preterm neonates with PH. PGI2increased the Pao2/Fio2ratio from a mean of 47 to 218 mmHg, with no change in SAP. In one infant, inhaled PGI2was continuously nebulized at a rate of 50 ng · kg−1· min−1for 12 h with no evidence of tolerance or systemic effects. Soditt et al. 79showed that inhaled PGI2significantly improved Pao2without affecting SAP in a preterm infant (28 weeks’ gestational age) with persistent PH of the newborn.
These studies and others 80suggest that inhaled PGI2can selectively decrease PAP and improve Pao2in the pediatric patient with acute lung injury or PH. The one comparative study of INO and inhaled PGI2to date 76does not permit any conclusion to be reached concerning the relative efficacy of either agent.
Summary of Inhaled Prostaglandin I2
There has been no investigation directly comparing equal doses of inhaled versus intravenous PGI2, but both animal 48and clinical studies in adult 39,53,67and pediatric populations 79,80clearly demonstrate that intravenous PGI2has a significant disadvantage in that it is not a selective pulmonary vasodilator, producing parallel decreases in SVR and PVR and increasing intrapulmonary shunt. In contrast, the overall conclusion from the published studies is that inhaled PGI2and INO are comparable in terms of their ability to selectively decrease PAP and improve oxygenation.
The ideal dose for inhaled PGI2has yet to be determined. Reports 41,52suggest that it is in the 5–50-ng · kg−1· min−1range, but it may be lower. Zwissler et al. 45found that a dose of inhaled PGI2as low as 0.9 ng · kg−1· min−1produced a significant reduction in PAP in dogs. The actual dose reaching the pulmonary vasculature is, of course, unknown since only approximately 10% of the dose of a nebulized agent reportedly reaches the alveolus. 81Systemic absorption of inhaled PGI2can occur as shown by the detection of its metabolites in the systemic circulation in some 42but not all 66clinical studies. However, the typical side effects attributed to intravenous PGI2(facial flushing, headache, jaw pain, diarrhea) are not observed with inhaled therapy, suggesting that systemic absorption is minimal. 82The vast majority of studies have demonstrated that inhaled PGI2has little to no effect on SAP. One report noted a significant decrease in diastolic arterial pressures in female (but not male) patients; however, a 250–500-μg bolus dose of inhaled PGI2was administered. 83This dose is more than 20 times greater than that used in other published reports. Selective pulmonary vasodilation is almost certainly dose related, and further studies are needed to determine the optimum dose–response of inhaled PGI2, which may differ between individuals, in different disease states, and whether pulmonary vasodilation or improved oxygenation is the primary goal of therapy. However, the available literature suggests that the usual dose used by us and other investigators (≤ 50 ng · kg−1· min−1) is well below the upper limit that may cause systemic hypotension.
Abrupt withdrawal of intravenous PGI2, 84including interruptions in drug delivery and sudden large reductions in dosage, may result in severe rebound PH, as described for INO. 85There are as yet no reports of this phenomenon with inhaled PGI2, but this should be regarded as a potential side effect until proven otherwise. There are conflicting reports concerning the effect of PGI2on bronchial tone, with some studies showing bronchoconstriction and others bronchodilation. 43,81,86–88However, no case of bronchospasm has been reported in the numerous clinical trials cited above. The effect of long-term therapy with inhaled PGI2on pulmonary function is not known. There is one report of PGI2causing a mild tracheitis when given intratracheally to piglets, which may be related to the alkalinity (pH 10.5) of the glycine buffer in which it is dissolved. 89However, in this study the investigators gave nine times the normal dose of diluent that would be administered to an adult human. A separate study was unable to detect any evidence of pulmonary toxicity, as measured by changes in lavaged cell counts, protein concentrations, concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase (nonspecific markers of cell injury), and fibronectin after 8 h of inhaled PGI2in healthy lambs. 41,In vitro evidence of inhibition of platelet aggregation has been reported in some clinical studies of inhaled PGI243,66but not in others. 42No studies have reported bleeding to be a problem even in patients after cardiac surgery. 66In this respect, the studies examining the antiplatelet effects of INO 90,91and inhaled PGI2have produced identical results.
Inhaled PGI2has some potential advantages over INO. The lack of toxicity of PGI2or its metabolites implies that accurate measurement of the concentration of delivered drug and its metabolites in inspiratory and expiratory gases is not critical, unlike with INO. In contrast to INO, the apparatus for the delivery of inhaled PGI2is inexpensive and readily available in any medical center. At a minimum, all that is required is a continuous nebulizer driven by an external gas source inserted into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit adjacent to the Y-piece. A number of investigators have described their delivery technique to ventilated (fig. 2) 42and nonventilated 56patients. At our institution we use the MiniHeart nebulizer (Westmed Inc., Tucson, AZ), which delivers 8 ml/h of the PGI2solution at a low driving gas flow rate of 2 l/min. The particle size delivered at this gas flow rate is 2 μm (information provided by Westmed Inc.). This is connected to a T-piece placed in the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit approximately 10 inches from the Y-piece (according to manufacturer instructions). The PGI2solution is reconstituted in the hospital pharmacy and diluted to a concentration that will deliver a dose of 50 ng · kg−1· min−1, based on 8 ml of the solution being nebulized per hour. The solution is contained in a 60-ml syringe that is placed in a syringe pump and set to deliver 8 ml/h to the nebulizer. The 60-ml syringe and nebulizer are foil wrapped to provide protection from light. Prostacyclin is continued at 50 ng · kg−1· min−1until the patient's condition has stabilized, at which time the dose is decreased to achieve the minimal effective concentration.
Although inhaled PGI2is an obvious alternative to INO, some of the other drugs described here deserve further attention. PGE1is more readily available than PGI2in hospitals that care for pediatric patients, but it has been the subject of only one clinical study. 23The lack of published data related to PGE1, as opposed to PGI2, was clearly influential in our own decision to investigate PGI2as an alternative to INO. The few studies to date suggest that both SNP and nitroglycerin also have the potential to be inexpensive alternatives to INO. The elaboration of NO donor drugs is an active area of research and may produce useful agents for clinical applications.
An important concern for physicians in the United States is that, with the exception of the use of INO in neonates, none of the agents mentioned here have FDA approval for delivery via the inhaled route. If these agents are administered as part of a research investigation, the investigators must obtain local institutional review board approval for the study and informed consent, and may require an FDA-approved investigational new drug license (verbal communication, Norman Stockbridge, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Cardio-renal Drug Products, FDA, March 1, 2002). The FDA does not require an investigational new drug license for a drug administered for a non–FDA-approved use or by a non–FDA-approved route, providing it is given for purely clinical purposes, so called “off-label” use. †However, it is advised that all physicians in the United States wishing to administer an inhaled vasodilator should consult their local institutional review board regarding the need for an approved protocol, informed consent, and an FDA investigational new drug license.
The daily cost of PGI2is only a small fraction of that of INO. The cost of INO has forced many clinicians in the United States to reconsider their indications for this therapy and may have had the unexpected effect of rekindling interest and promoting research into alternative inhaled pulmonary vasodilators. Based on the evidence to date, it would appear that other selective pulmonary vasodilators may be as effective as INO with less potential for toxicity, significantly lower costs, and greater ease of administration. Further research is required to determine whether these agents have any advantage over INO in terms of altering pulmonary pathology and patient outcome.
The author thanks Carl Lynch, M.D., Ph.D., George Rich, M.D., Ph.D., and David Alpern (Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia), and Bernhard Zwissler, M.D. (Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munchen, Germany), for their help in the preparation of this manuscript.