RESISTANCE to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) occurs in many clinical diseases and drug interactions. This phenomenon is attributed to changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. In this case report, we present a transient loss of response to three different NMBAs in a patient suffered from tetanus.

A 49-yr-old woman (weight, 55 kg; height, 156 cm) was referred to our medical center in October 2000 because of trismus and nuchal rigidity. Tetanus toxoid had been given to her in a local clinic a week prior to this admission because of general malaise and masseter rigidity. When hospitalized, she presented with tachycardia, hypertension, tachypnea, profuse sweating, copious saliva, trismus, nuchal rigidity, and hyperreactivity to noise. Past history was unremarkable except chronic onychomycosis with paronychia over right thumb. She worked in rice fields and made a recent trip to southeast Asia 40 days prior to this episode. Physical examination revealed no obvious skin wound. Laboratory findings showed only leukocytosis (12,600/mm3). Cerebrospinal fluid examination was unremarkable. Due to intractable trismus, dribbling, and impending respiratory failure, she was scheduled to receive emergent tracheostomy under general anesthesia. Before induction of anesthesia, a train-of-four (TOF) electromyography was installed in order to monitor neuromuscular function during operation. Anesthesia was induced with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, propofol 200 mg, and fentanyl 50 μg. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane 1.5% and oxygen. Short-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA), mivacurium (11 mg), was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Surprisingly, the full dose of mivacurium did not provide an adequate muscle relaxation measured by TOF and was accompanied by undesirable spontaneous movement (fig. 1, M). Additional doses of 4 mg mivacurium (fig. 1, M), 25 mg atracurium (fig. 1, A), and 5 mg vecuronium (fig. 1, V) still did not suppress the TOF value to zero. The patient was sent to intensive care unit after tracheostomy was completed.

Fig. 1. Resistance to three NMBAs in tetanus. A continuous record from peri-operative evoked electromyographic monitoring (Train-of-four stimulation, a Datex neuromuscular transmission monitor). M: mivacurium (11 mg and 4 mg, intravenously, respectively); A: atracurium (25 mg, intravenously, each dose); V: vecuronium (5 mg, intravenously). The TOF ratio was given in percentage. It is noted that TOF ratio was always higher than 0.70 in the presence of all three NMBAs.

Fig. 1. Resistance to three NMBAs in tetanus. A continuous record from peri-operative evoked electromyographic monitoring (Train-of-four stimulation, a Datex neuromuscular transmission monitor). M: mivacurium (11 mg and 4 mg, intravenously, respectively); A: atracurium (25 mg, intravenously, each dose); V: vecuronium (5 mg, intravenously). The TOF ratio was given in percentage. It is noted that TOF ratio was always higher than 0.70 in the presence of all three NMBAs.

Close modal

In the quiet, isolated room of the intensive care unit, antibiotics with penicillin (3 million units every 6 h for 5 days) were prescribed and later was replaced by metronidazole (500 mg every 6 h for 13 days). Muscle spasm was controlled with atracurium (0.6–0.8 mg · kg−1· h−1) and propofol (0.02 to 0.03 mg · kg−1· min−1for 7 days). Propofol was later replaced by midazolam (0.3 mg · kg−1· h−1for 7 days). An electromyography and a nerve conduction study were performed 16 h after surgery at bedside. The nerve conduction study (NCS) revealed only mild suppression of amplitude of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP). Nerve conduction velocity and sensory nerve conduction study were within normal range. The needle electromyography studies revealed reflex spasm with persistent electromyographic activity in the masseter muscle. A follow-up of TOF revealed a normal twitch suppression following atracurium 40 h after surgery (fig. 2). The patient was weaned from the ventilator and artificial airway 21 days after initiation of artificial ventilation. No significant sequela was ever noted and the patient was discharged from our hospital uneventfully.

Fig. 2. Complete recovery of normal response to atracurium 40 h after surgery in ICU. Atracurium infusion was first discontinued. TOF monitoring was installed at bedside. After a short stabilization, atracurium infusion was restarted. It is contrasting that atracurium caused a rapid decrease of TOF ratio to zero level.

Fig. 2. Complete recovery of normal response to atracurium 40 h after surgery in ICU. Atracurium infusion was first discontinued. TOF monitoring was installed at bedside. After a short stabilization, atracurium infusion was restarted. It is contrasting that atracurium caused a rapid decrease of TOF ratio to zero level.

Close modal

Resistance to nondepolarizing NMBAs has been noted in patients with burns, 1hepatic disease, sepsis, cerebral palsy, 2immobilization, 3and in patients taking anticonvulsants. 4The potential contributing factors to the resistance are altered pharmacokinetics, 5resulting from escape of drug via  wounds, increased protein binding, altered volume of distribution, depressed plasma cholinesterase activity and enhanced hepatic or renal elimination. As a receptor-mediated potential for resistance, the nicotinic receptor (AChRs) characteristics can be altered at the level of number, functions and localization by thermal injury. 6,7However, the cellular mechanism responsible for, e.g. , up-regulation of AChRs, remains unclear.

The diagnosis of tetanus in this patient was favored because of her typical symptoms and signs, and clinical progress under standard treatment against tetanus. 8,9Although no obvious deep penetrating wounds were identified, this occurred in 30% of patients with tetanus. The differential diagnosis of tetanus includes orofacial infection, drug-induced dystonic reactions and other neurologic diseases, which were all excluded in this patient. The characteristic electrophysiological findings of tetanus include a short or absent silent period, an exaggerated F-response, and persisted electromyography activity. 10The mild suppressed CMAP amplitude noted in this patient might be due to tetanus toxin itself or due to effect of atracurium when the patient had recovered from resistance.

Effects of clostridial neurotoxins on synaptic neurotransmission have been well documented. 11–13In contrast to botulism, Clostridium tetani  binds to the presynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), is internalized and transported retroaxonally to the spinal cord. The toxin-induced inhibition of neurotransmitter release from spinal inhibitory interneurons results in spastic paralysis. 14In various animal species (including human beings), direct blocking action of C. tetani  at NMJ has been reported. The toxin lowers the presynaptic resting membrane potential, decreases both evoked and spontaneous transmitter release at NMJ. 15Whether the binding efficacy of nondepolarizing NMBAs onto postsynaptic nicotinic receptors is therefore indirectly changed by toxin remains unknown. It is worthy to note that the tolerance in this patient was crossing over 3 different competitive NMBAs, although the conventional doses we used were only approximately 2 to 3 times the ED95and so would not block all receptors at the NMJ. Interestingly, similar resistance to NMBAs has also been reported in the early phase of tetanus, 16while NMBAs have been widely used in patients with tetanus. 17Failure to detect any transient loss of response to NMBAs in early phase of tetanus might be caused either by a lack of opportunity of using TOF monitoring or being masked by heavy intravenous sedation without notice. The exact cellular mechanisms for the resistance to NMBAs and its recovery in tetanus still need further exploration.

The authors thank Ya-Chun Chu, M.D., Ph.D., and Mei-Yung Tsou, M.D., Ph.D. (Associate professors, Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan) for their technical assistance.

1.
Martyn JA, Goudsouzian NG, Chang Y, Szyfelbein SK, Schwartz AE, Patel SS: Neuromuscular effects of mivacurium in 2- to 12-yr-old children with burn injury. A nesthesiology 2000; 92: 31–7
2.
Moorthy SS, Krishna G, Dierdorf SF: Resistance to vecuronium in patients with cerebral palsy. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 275–7
3.
Hepaguslar H, Uyar M, Ugur G, Balcioglu T: Resistance to vecuronium after immobilization. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 94–5
4.
Soriano SG, Sullivan LJ, Venkatakrishnan K, Greenblatt DJ, Martyn JA: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vecuronium in children receiving phenytoin or carbamazepine for chronic anticonvulsant therapy. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 223–9
5.
Alloul K, Whalley DG, Shutway F, Ebrahim Z, Varin F: Pharmacokinetic origin of carbamazepine-induced resistance to vecuronium neuromuscular blockade in anesthetized patients. A nesthesiology 1996; 84: 330–9
6.
Ibebunjo C, Martyn JA: Thermal injury induces greater resistance to d-tubocurarine in local rather than in distant muscles in the rat. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1243–9
7.
Martyn JA, White DA, Gronert GA, Jaffe RS, Ward JM: Up-and-down regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptors. Effects on neuromuscular blockers. A nesthesiology 1992; 76: 822–43
8.
Cook TM, Protheroe RT, Handel JM: Tetanus: a review of the literature. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 477–87
9.
Henderson SO, Mody T, Groth DE, Moore JJ, Newton E: The presentation of tetanus in an emergency department. J Emerg Med 1998; 16: 705–8
10.
Fernandez JM, Ferrandiz M, Larrea L, Ramio R, Boada M: Cephalic tetanus studied with single fibre EMG. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 862–6
11.
Farrar JJ, Yen LM, Cook TM, Fairweather N, Binh N, Parry, J, Parry, CM: Neurological aspects of tropical disease: Tetanus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 292–301
12.
Pellizzari R, Rossetto O, Schiavo G, Montecucco C: Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: mechanism of action and therapeutic uses. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1999; 354: 259–68
13.
Humeau Y, Doussau F, Grant NJ, Poulain B: How botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release. Biochimie 2000; 82: 427–46
14.
Mellanby J, Green J: How does tetanus toxin act? Neuroscience 1981; 6: 281–300
15.
Parsons RL, Hofmann WW, Feigen GA: Mode of action of tetanus toxin on the neuromuscular junction. Am J Physiol 1966; 210: 84–90
16.
Anandaciva S, Koay CW: Tetanus and rocuronium in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 505–6
17.
Fassoulaki A, Eforakopoulou M: Vecuronium in the management of tetanus. Is it the muscle relaxant of choice? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1988; 39: 75–8