Fig. 6. Three examples of the concentration–effect relation predicted by the pharmacodynamic model f(x) = E0(1 − xγ), where xγ= Uγ/2 and U = C/C50, obtained at three fixed values of γ (0.2, 1, and 4). When γ= 1, the model becomes linear. At all three γ values, negative effects are possible at drug concentrations x > C50· 21/γ. Note that the values for C50and γ were chosen in such a way that the zero crossing for all three examples occurred at the same value of C. As a consequence, the values of C causing 50% of the effect (i.e. , C50) occur at different values of C (C1through C3are the C50values for the three different curves). Different values for C50and γ would result in the zero crossing at different values of C. E0= baseline effect; E50= 50% depression of effect.

Fig. 6. Three examples of the concentration–effect relation predicted by the pharmacodynamic model f(x) = E0(1 − xγ), where xγ= Uγ/2 and U = C/C50, obtained at three fixed values of γ (0.2, 1, and 4). When γ= 1, the model becomes linear. At all three γ values, negative effects are possible at drug concentrations x > C50· 21/γ. Note that the values for C50and γ were chosen in such a way that the zero crossing for all three examples occurred at the same value of C. As a consequence, the values of C causing 50% of the effect (i.e. , C50) occur at different values of C (C1through C3are the C50values for the three different curves). Different values for C50and γ would result in the zero crossing at different values of C. E0= baseline effect; E50= 50% depression of effect.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal