Fig. 2. Charge lag between date of service and transmission to payer. In June 2004, the billing vendor began receiving electronic data, but full implementation occurred over a 2-month period. The average charge lag decreased by 7.3 days in the last 5 months of 2004, compared with the months preceding electronic charge transmission. 

Fig. 2. Charge lag between date of service and transmission to payer. In June 2004, the billing vendor began receiving electronic data, but full implementation occurred over a 2-month period. The average charge lag decreased by 7.3 days in the last 5 months of 2004, compared with the months preceding electronic charge transmission. 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal