Fig. 7. Effects of simulated isoflurane targets on spike latency and Ca2+influx. (  A ) Relation between conductance and spike latency, measured as time from stimulus to arrival of the peak of the spike at the bouton, and normalized to the latency of the spike at baseline. All conductances were capable of slowing action potentials. (  A1 ) Reduction of  gNaV . (  A2 ) Increasing  gKV . (  A3 ) Increasing  gKL . (  A4 ) Increasing  gClL . (  B ) Effects of conductance changes on spike amplitude. (  B1 ) Inhibition of  gNaV reduces spike height. (  B2 ) Activation of  gKV reduces spike amplitude. (  B3 ) Activation of  gKL causes a small reduction in action potential amplitude. (  B4 ) Activation of  gClL increases spike height. (  C ) Relation between conductance and spike breadth, measured as the width at half amplitude (t1/2). (  C1 ) Reducing  gNaV causes modest narrowing of action potentials. (  C2 ) Activation of  gKV strongly reduces t1/2. (  C3 ) Activation of  gKL causes a small narrowing of the spike. (  C4 ) Increased  gClL causes a slight broadening of the action potential. (  D ) Relation between altered conductances and charge transfer (Q) for Ca2+, normalized to baseline conditions and raised to the fourth power (QCa4) to reflect neurotransmitter release. (  D1 ) Reducing  gNaV causes a monotonic reduction in QCa4. (  D2 ) Increasing  gKV results in a steep decrease in QCa4. (  D3 ) Increasing  gKL results in an apparently biphasic response, with a shallow decrease in QCafollowed by a near-linear drop-off. (  D4 ) Activation of  gClL causes an inverted U-shaped response, with QCaincreasing at low levels, and decreasing toward baseline with higher levels of  gCl activation. (  E ) Spike latency versus QCa4. In addition to the conductances shown in panels  A-D above, the results of simulating reduction of  gKV and  gCaN are plotted. The relation between latency and QCa4predicts that each conductance should generate a distinct and measurable pattern. 

Fig. 7. Effects of simulated isoflurane targets on spike latency and Ca2+influx. (  A ) Relation between conductance and spike latency, measured as time from stimulus to arrival of the peak of the spike at the bouton, and normalized to the latency of the spike at baseline. All conductances were capable of slowing action potentials. (  A1 ) Reduction of  gNaV . (  A2 ) Increasing  gKV . (  A3 ) Increasing  gKL . (  A4 ) Increasing  gClL . (  B ) Effects of conductance changes on spike amplitude. (  B1 ) Inhibition of  gNaV reduces spike height. (  B2 ) Activation of  gKV reduces spike amplitude. (  B3 ) Activation of  gKL causes a small reduction in action potential amplitude. (  B4 ) Activation of  gClL increases spike height. (  C ) Relation between conductance and spike breadth, measured as the width at half amplitude (t1/2). (  C1 ) Reducing  gNaV causes modest narrowing of action potentials. (  C2 ) Activation of  gKV strongly reduces t1/2. (  C3 ) Activation of  gKL causes a small narrowing of the spike. (  C4 ) Increased  gClL causes a slight broadening of the action potential. (  D ) Relation between altered conductances and charge transfer (Q) for Ca2+, normalized to baseline conditions and raised to the fourth power (QCa4) to reflect neurotransmitter release. (  D1 ) Reducing  gNaV causes a monotonic reduction in QCa4. (  D2 ) Increasing  gKV results in a steep decrease in QCa4. (  D3 ) Increasing  gKL results in an apparently biphasic response, with a shallow decrease in QCafollowed by a near-linear drop-off. (  D4 ) Activation of  gClL causes an inverted U-shaped response, with QCaincreasing at low levels, and decreasing toward baseline with higher levels of  gCl activation. (  E ) Spike latency versus QCa4. In addition to the conductances shown in panels  A-D above, the results of simulating reduction of  gKV and  gCaN are plotted. The relation between latency and QCa4predicts that each conductance should generate a distinct and measurable pattern. 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal