Fig. 3. Contribution of changes in peak current (Ipeak) and current time course to depression of transmembrane charge transfer (QT) by halothane. (  A ) Representative current responses in control (CTL) and 1 mm halothane (HAL) to the voltage protocol shown above elicited from a single cells expressing α1Cβ2a and α1Cβ2aα2/δ1 channels.  Solid lines indicate baselines.  Shaded areas under the response time course indicate the integral of current which represents the QT. (  B ) Plots of QT (percent control) and the contribution of Ipeak (percent) to changes in charge reduction (δQT)  versus halothane concentration in grouped data (mean ± SEM, n = 3–5 cells) for both channels as indicated (see text). * Significant differences (  P < 0.05), unpaired  t test. 

Fig. 3. Contribution of changes in peak current (Ipeak) and current time course to depression of transmembrane charge transfer (QT) by halothane. (  A ) Representative current responses in control (CTL) and 1 mm halothane (HAL) to the voltage protocol shown above elicited from a single cells expressing α1Cβ2a and α1Cβ2aα21 channels.  Solid lines indicate baselines.  Shaded areas under the response time course indicate the integral of current which represents the QT. (  B ) Plots of QT (percent control) and the contribution of Ipeak (percent) to changes in charge reduction (δQT)  versus halothane concentration in grouped data (mean ± SEM, n = 3–5 cells) for both channels as indicated (see text). * Significant differences (  P < 0.05), unpaired  t test. 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal