Fig. 4. Effect of isoflurane on cell death. With the use of matched plates, neural stem cells were exposed to control conditions or isoflurane, 0.7, 1.4, or 2.8%, for 6 h. The percentage of dead cells was determined by propidium iodide (PI) staining at the end of treatment or 6 or 24 h later. Image of PI-stained cells in a control plate (A) . Image of PI staining in a matched plate 24 h after isoflurane, 2.8%(B) . Hoechst (33342) nuclear staining (blue ); nestin staining (Alexa Fluor 488) (green ); PI (pink ). PI-positive cells (arrows ). Compared with the corresponding control, isoflurane, 0.7 (C) , 1.4 (D) , and 2.8%(E) , had no effect on the percentage of cells that stained positive for PI, but there was an effect of time after treatment, with a larger percentage of cells staining positive for PI 6 and 24 h after treatment with isoflurane, 1.4 and 2.8%, compared with the end of treatment time point. Because the data failed normality testing, results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn's testing for multiple comparisons. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) for N = 12 wells per treatment condition (eight images per well using a 20× objective) at each time point.

Fig. 4. Effect of isoflurane on cell death. With the use of matched plates, neural stem cells were exposed to control conditions or isoflurane, 0.7, 1.4, or 2.8%, for 6 h. The percentage of dead cells was determined by propidium iodide (PI) staining at the end of treatment or 6 or 24 h later. Image of PI-stained cells in a control plate (A) . Image of PI staining in a matched plate 24 h after isoflurane, 2.8%(B) . Hoechst (33342) nuclear staining (blue ); nestin staining (Alexa Fluor 488) (green ); PI (pink ). PI-positive cells (arrows ). Compared with the corresponding control, isoflurane, 0.7 (C) , 1.4 (D) , and 2.8%(E) , had no effect on the percentage of cells that stained positive for PI, but there was an effect of time after treatment, with a larger percentage of cells staining positive for PI 6 and 24 h after treatment with isoflurane, 1.4 and 2.8%, compared with the end of treatment time point. Because the data failed normality testing, results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn's testing for multiple comparisons. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) for N = 12 wells per treatment condition (eight images per well using a 20× objective) at each time point.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal